On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:36:07 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, wrote:
> > my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
> > control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
> > hereby present for your amusement and comm
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, wrote:
> my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
> control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
> hereby present for your amusement and comments.
> (attached as whole files, since the patch would be unreadable)
On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:36:07 +0300, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, wrote:
> > my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
> > control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
> > hereby present for your amusement and com
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, wrote:
> my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
> control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
> hereby present for your amusement and comments.
> (attached as whole files, since the patch would be unreadable)
Hi,
my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
hereby present for your amusement and comments.
(attached as whole files, since the patch would be unreadable)
The main point of the rewrite is splitting
Hi,
my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
hereby present for your amusement and comments.
(attached as whole files, since the patch would be unreadable)
The main point of the rewrite is splitting
