At Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:53:14 +0100,
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > > 2. It removes the "inbox" and "unread" tags while adding the tag to
> > >indicate deletion.
> >
> > Hey, Carl. Why is this last point
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
2. It removes the inbox and unread tags while adding the tag to
indicate deletion.
Hey, Carl. Why is this last point important? [...]Why should it modify any
other
tags? A message/thread should be
At Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:53:14 +0100,
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
2. It removes the inbox and unread tags while adding the tag to
indicate deletion.
Hey, Carl. Why is this last point important?
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:28:29 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > > 2. It removes the "inbox" and "unread" tags while adding the tag to
> > >indicate deletion.
> >
> > Hey, Carl. Why is this last point important?
>
>
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:53:50 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> But this patch does have two good ideas not in the other patch, (both of
> which I mentioned in the review):
>
> 1. It adds a keybinding to the notmuch-show mode
>
> 2. It removes the "inbox" and "unread" tags while adding the tag to
>
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> > 2. It removes the "inbox" and "unread" tags while adding the tag to
> >indicate deletion.
>
> Hey, Carl. Why is this last point important?
I guess I was imagining the case of running "notmuch search tag:inbox"
at the
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:56:07 +0100 (CET), racin at free.fr wrote:
> I posted a similar patch a while ago, that also did not show deleted
> messages by default. Don't know if Carl wants to integrate this though
OK. When two people are independently contributing similar
functionality, it's more
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:53:50 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
But this patch does have two good ideas not in the other patch, (both of
which I mentioned in the review):
1. It adds a keybinding to the notmuch-show mode
2. It removes the inbox and unread tags while adding the tag
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
2. It removes the inbox and unread tags while adding the tag to
indicate deletion.
Hey, Carl. Why is this last point important?
I guess I was imagining the case of running notmuch search tag:inbox
at
It adds a tag 'delete' and removes the tags 'inbox' and 'unread'.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth
---
notmuch.el |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el
index 97914f2..ff930c9 100644
--- a/notmuch.el
+++ b/notmuch.el
@@ -63,6 +63,7
2010 10h32:10 GMT +00:00 GMT - Grande-Bretagne,
Irlande, Portugal
Objet: [notmuch] [PATCH] add notmuch-show-delete keybinding 'd'
It adds a tag 'delete' and removes the tags 'inbox' and 'unread'.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
---
notmuch.el |8
1 files
11 matches
Mail list logo