[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz, but it > > is not rebased to the current master. > > Not sure what I a

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz, but it > is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a dump/dele

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it > > is not rebased to the current master. > > Not sure what I am d

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it > is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a dump/delete/

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, micah anderson wrote: > On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > > SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > > > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmu

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, micah anderson wrote: > On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This, (along with "allow mailing-

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This, (along with "allow mailing-

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > >From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > cworth/master, so it shoul

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > >From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > cworth/master, so it should

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-04-07, micah anderson wrote: > > > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > > > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > > > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This patch in included in my branch now. Th

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-04-07, micah anderson wrote: > > > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > > > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > > > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This patch in included in my branch now. Th

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson > wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > > would like to advocate the fol

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > > wrote: > > > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > > would like to advocate the following branc

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > > contains

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > wrote: > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > > contains 1 or 2 p

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > cworth/master, so it should

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > cworth/master, so it shoul

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

Resending as this did not get through the list somehow. Sorry, if it pops up twice now -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sebastian Spaeth Subject: no subject Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:13:31 +0100 Size: 2430 URL:

[notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

Resending as this did not get through the list somehow. Sorry, if it pops up twice now --- Begin Message --- >From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been base