[notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-04-24 Thread Carl Worth
-- carl.d.worth at intel.com On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:56:04 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > I'd love to put this into shape to become part of notmuch proper. Great! > My question, for this and other things I've worked on, is where code > that targets message-mode should go. In notmuch-mua.el?

[notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-04-24 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:36 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > So here's my vote for someone cleaning this up into a patch that could > be applied directly to notmuch rather than just being a snippet of code > to shove into .emacs. I'd love to put this into shape to become part of notmuch proper. My

[notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-04-24 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:35:16 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On 2010-03-05, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > > One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the > > ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the > > thread structure will often make that

Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-04-24 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:35:16 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On 2010-03-05, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the thread structure will often

Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-04-24 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:36 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: So here's my vote for someone cleaning this up into a patch that could be applied directly to notmuch rather than just being a snippet of code to shove into .emacs. I'd love to put this into shape to become part of notmuch

Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-04-24 Thread Carl Worth
-- carl.d.wo...@intel.com On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:56:04 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote: I'd love to put this into shape to become part of notmuch proper. Great! My question, for this and other things I've worked on, is where code that targets message-mode should go. In

[notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-04-22 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-03-05, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the > ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the > thread structure will often make that clear, but for both searching and > syncing, an "answered" tag would be

Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-04-22 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-03-05, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the thread structure will often make that clear, but for both searching and syncing, an answered tag would be nice.

[notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-03-05 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-03-05, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > By the way, the reason that I didn't submit this as a patch to > notmuch.el is that I'm not sure how we want to deal with things that are > actually more about message-mode, and could possibly affect other > programs using message-mode (gnus). This is

[notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-03-05 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:39:14 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the > ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the > thread structure will often make that clear, but for both searching and > syncing, an

[notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-03-05 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
Dear All, One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the thread structure will often make that clear, but for both searching and syncing, an "answered" tag would be nice. To solve this, I have added

[notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-03-05 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
Dear All, One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the thread structure will often make that clear, but for both searching and syncing, an answered tag would be nice. To solve this, I have added the

Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages

2010-03-05 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:39:14 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote: One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the thread structure will often make that clear, but for both searching and