Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it > > is not rebased to the current master. > > Not sure what I am d

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-09 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote: > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it > is not rebased to the current master. Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a dump/delete/

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-08 Thread Michal Sojka
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, micah anderson wrote: > On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-07 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This, (along with "allow mailing-

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-07 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > >From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > cworth/master, so it shoul

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-07 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On 2010-04-07, micah anderson wrote: > > > The only other patch that I find absolutely crucial, that you do not > > > include, is the 'Preserve folder information when indexing' patch which, > > > although not perfect, does significantly change my life. This patch in included in my branch now. Th

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-04-06 Thread micah anderson
On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > > wrote: > > > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > > would like to advocate the following branc

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-03-27 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson wrote: > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > wrote: > > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > > contains 1 or 2 p

Re: [notmuch] [Sebastian Spaeth] Pull requests

2010-03-25 Thread micah anderson
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I > would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each > contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays > cworth/master, so it shoul