also sprach Carl Worth [2010.01.15.1108 +1300]:
> > Reading is one thing. Information storage and organisation is
> > another. After a message is delivered (and read) to my mailbox,
> > it's really mine and I can (and should be able) to affix it and
> > integrate it into my organisational scheme a
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:12:38 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Reading is one thing. Information storage and organisation is
> another. After a message is delivered (and read) to my mailbox, it's
> really mine and I can (and should be able) to affix it and integrate
> it into my organisational scheme
also sprach Carl Worth [2009.12.11.0639 +1300]:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:21:34 -0700, Mark Anderson
> wrote:
> > I was wondering if there's a way in notmuch to group un-associated
> > threads into a single thread.
>
> There's certainly nothing like that in notmuch currently.
>
> Sup had user-le
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:54:20 +0100, Marten Veldthuis
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:30:13 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> > But I still have a hard time justifying user operations to manipulate
> > threading. The whole point of threading is to make it faster to process
> > and read messages. But man
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:30:13 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> But I still have a hard time justifying user operations to manipulate
> threading. The whole point of threading is to make it faster to process
> and read messages. But manual operations like joining and splitting
> threads seem like the user
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:18 +0100, Marten Veldthuis
wrote:
> On a related note, what about communicating with people who press reply
> on an existing message, change the subject and start a new mail
> thread. Most mail clients will still insert the In-Reply-To header,
> which in this case is jus
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:48 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I think the right answer here is to fix the input that notmuch is
> getting. Just ensure that each message has a proper In-Reply-To header
> and all should be fine.
On a related note, what about communicating with people who press reply
on a
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:21:34 -0700, Mark Anderson wrote:
> I was wondering if there's a way in notmuch to group un-associated
> threads into a single thread.
There's certainly nothing like that in notmuch currently.
Sup had user-level functionality in the interface for stitching messages
into a s
