On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:27:35 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:00:08 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > All of the authors appear in the output already, but that doesn't seem
> > to be the case of the subjects. Would you envisage doing something
> > similar to the changes Dirk
On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:27:35 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:00:08 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
All of the authors appear in the output already, but that doesn't seem
to be the case of the subjects. Would you envisage doing something
similar
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:00:08 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> All of the authors appear in the output already, but that doesn't seem
> to be the case of the subjects. Would you envisage doing something
> similar to the changes Dirk made for authors?
Right. We do have a similar approach already
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:00:08 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
All of the authors appear in the output already, but that doesn't seem
to be the case of the subjects. Would you envisage doing something
similar to the changes Dirk made for authors?
Right. We do have a similar approach
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:42:48 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Next, I wonder if we shouldn't do something similar for the search
> view. It might be quite handy if all authors and all unique subjects for
> a thread were made available for i-search in the buffer, but hidden by
> default and expanded as
