On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
>
>>
>> In any event, if the mml tag is present, it's no longer in notmuch's
>> hands; emacs's mail processing is handling things and calling gpg-agent
>> to sign/encrypt the message.
>>
>> Can you cla
On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>>> Perhaps people with no ability to sign are less likely to have
>>> "notmuch-crypto-process-mime" set? Or we can add another configuration
>>> variable initialized from notmuch-crypto-process-mime, b
On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
>
>>
>> In any event, if the mml tag is present, it's no longer in notmuch's
>> hands; emacs's mail processing is handling things and calling gpg-agent
>> to sign/encrypt the message.
>>
>> Can you clarif
On Mon, Apr 14 2014, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>>> Perhaps people with no ability to sign are less likely to have
>>> "notmuch-crypto-process-mime" set? Or we can add another configuration
>>> variable initialized from notmuch-crypto-process-mime, bu
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>>
>> Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails
>> work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of
>> the box) :D
>>
>
> It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to s
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Well, I set notmuch-crypto-process-mime to nil -- it still wants to
> sign the message and runs gpg...
>
Was it nil when you replied, i.e. when the mml tags were created?
d
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> Perhaps people with no ability to sign are less likely to have
>> "notmuch-crypto-process-mime" set? Or we can add another configuration
>> variable initialized from notmuch-crypto-process-mime, but allowing
>> people to shut this off.
>
> Well, I set no
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> Perhaps people with no ability to sign are less likely to have
>> "notmuch-crypto-process-mime" set? Or we can add another configuration
>> variable initialized from notmuch-crypto-process-mime, but allowing
>> people to shut this off.
>
> Well, I set no
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Well, I set notmuch-crypto-process-mime to nil -- it still wants to
> sign the message and runs gpg...
>
Was it nil when you replied, i.e. when the mml tags were created?
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http:
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
>
>> This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to
>> signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys
>> when crypto processing has been activated.
>>
>
> The (merged) patch seems straightforw
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>>
>> Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails
>> work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of
>> the box) :D
>>
>
> It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to s
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails
> work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of
> the box) :D
>
It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to sign things, which
I'm sometimes too lazy to do. In my
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails
> work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of
> the box) :D
>
It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to sign things, which
I'm sometimes too lazy to do. In my
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
>
>> This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to
>> signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys
>> when crypto processing has been activated.
>>
>
> The (merged) patch seems straightforw
Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
> This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to
> signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys
> when crypto processing has been activated.
>
The (merged) patch seems straightforward and seems to work. I'll
probably push it tomorrow
Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
> This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to
> signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys
> when crypto processing has been activated.
>
The (merged) patch seems straightforward and seems to work. I'll
probably push it tomorrow
This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to
signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys
when crypto processing has been activated.
---
Thanks to mjw1009 for implementation suggestions.
Jani, you might consider squashing this with your original for a v2.
Pushin
This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to
signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys
when crypto processing has been activated.
---
Thanks to mjw1009 for implementation suggestions.
Jani, you might consider squashing this with your original for a v2.
Pushin
18 matches
Mail list logo
