On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Charlie Allom wrote:
> If Felipe is interested in maintaining the Vim plugin, I vote it should
> be replaced with his Ruby version.
I've pushed the new vim plugin to the 'master' branch.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras
___
If Felipe is interested in maintaining the Vim plugin, I vote it should
be replaced with his Ruby version.
Please don't explain why you think emacs is better than vim.
C.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:34:48PM -0600, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Patrick Totzke
> wr
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Patrick Totzke wrote:
> Quoting Felipe Contreras (2013-04-03 10:09:39)
>> ...
>> What you prefer is irrelevant; it's relevant only for you, that's why it's
>> called a *preference*, the rest of us prefer different things.
>
> Never mind preferences, I think original
Quoting Felipe Contreras (2013-04-03 10:09:39)
> ...
> What you prefer is irrelevant; it's relevant only for you, that's why it's
> called a *preference*, the rest of us prefer different things.
Never mind preferences, I think originally, this thread was about dropping
*support* for the *original*
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:09:39AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> guyzmo wrote:
>
> > I personnally prefer a thousand times to use mutt-kz, alot as MUA, and
> > vim only for writing mails.
[...]
> I've tried mutt-kz and alot, and I was utterly dissapointed by both.
>
> See how snappy and
guyzmo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:55:13PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't following the ml.
>
> same here
>
> > David Bremner wrote:
> > > - There are now several alternatives for people whose only motivation to
> > > use the vim frontend was disl
Quoting guyzmo (2013-04-03 07:01:58)
> ...
> It may be nice and/or fun to use that kind of things in vim, but
> really, it's opposite to the philosophy of vim.
> ...
> Whereas you seem to have done a really good job integrating it to
> vim, I personally think that anything that
Hi
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:55:13PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't following the ml.
same here
> David Bremner wrote:
> > - There are now several alternatives for people whose only motivation to
> > use the vim frontend was dislike of emacs (alot and notm
Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> I did try the emacs frontend, and it was not working properly for me at the
> time, and I believe I documented my issues. It was not just my dislike of
> emacs
> that motivated me to write notmuch-vim-ruby.
I could only find a comment about the (admittedly imperfect)
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't following the ml.
David Bremner wrote:
> There is apparently still some people that use it (although notice the
> "Vote" column is 0).
>
> On the other hand
>
> - The vim frontend is afaik the last thing depending on the legacy text
> output format.
>
David Bremner writes:
> So, nobody has jumped to the defence of the vim plugin. Unless some
> better idea emerges in the next week or so, I plan to move it to the
> contrib/ directory and mark it as deprecated in NEWS.
Done. Also updated the Debian packaging to stop building the package
notmuch
David Bremner writes:
> I'm not sure what, if anything to do about the vim frontend.
>
So, nobody has jumped to the defence of the vim plugin. Unless some
better idea emerges in the next week or so, I plan to move it to the
contrib/ directory and mark it as deprecated in NEWS.
d
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
