Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Tomi Ollila]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:42:36 +0100, Karel Zak  wrote:
> 
> It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
> you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:
> 
>   yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel
> 
> to get:
> 
>  $ rpm -q notmuch gmime
>  notmuch-0.11-1.fc17.x86_64
>  gmime-2.5.8-1.fc16.x86_64

Great thing -- I'm just wary of using that gmime version with
notmuch: check id:"1329840343-10026-1-git-send-email-schnouki at schnouki.net"

So, so far I'll run notmuch on Fedora 16 using gmime-2.4.25

(Well, I also use notmuch 0.11.1+239~g4d2d96b ;)

> Karel

Tomi

> 
> -- 
>  Karel Zak  
>  http://karelzak.blogspot.com

Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Karel Zak]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:31:39PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken  fernseed.info> wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante  > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> > > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> > > Fedora 16.
> > 
> > Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)
> > 
> > And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread
> > F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API
> > differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't
> > part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.
> > 
> > What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is
> > 2.6 officially out there and stable?
> 
> Some conditional compilation by #if(def)ing some *GMIME* macro...
> 
> While doing something else I passed by these messages:
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/notmuch at notmuchmail.org/msg05829.html
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=269819
> 
> These seems to provide valuable information to anyone attempting
> to compile notmuch with gmime 2.5+

It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:

  yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel

to get:

 $ rpm -q notmuch gmime
 notmuch-0.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 gmime-2.5.8-1.fc16.x86_64


Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com

Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Tomi Ollila]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:42:36 +0100, Karel Zak  wrote:
> 
> It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
> you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:
> 
>   yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel
> 
> to get:
> 
>  $ rpm -q notmuch gmime
>  notmuch-0.11-1.fc17.x86_64
>  gmime-2.5.8-1.fc16.x86_64

Great thing -- I'm just wary of using that gmime version with
notmuch: check id:"1329840343-10026-1-git-send-email-schno...@schnouki.net"

So, so far I'll run notmuch on Fedora 16 using gmime-2.4.25

(Well, I also use notmuch 0.11.1+239~g4d2d96b ;)

> Karel

Tomi

> 
> -- 
>  Karel Zak  
>  http://karelzak.blogspot.com


___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Karel Zak]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:31:39PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken 
>  wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante 
> >  wrote:
> > > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> > > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> > > Fedora 16.
> > 
> > Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)
> > 
> > And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread
> > F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API
> > differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't
> > part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.
> > 
> > What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is
> > 2.6 officially out there and stable?
> 
> Some conditional compilation by #if(def)ing some *GMIME* macro...
> 
> While doing something else I passed by these messages:
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/notmuch@notmuchmail.org/msg05829.html
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=269819
> 
> These seems to provide valuable information to anyone attempting
> to compile notmuch with gmime 2.5+

It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:

  yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel

to get:

 $ rpm -q notmuch gmime
 notmuch-0.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 gmime-2.5.8-1.fc16.x86_64


Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Tomi Ollila]

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken  wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante  gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> > Fedora 16.
> 
> Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)
> 
> And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread
> F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API
> differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't
> part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.
> 
> What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is
> 2.6 officially out there and stable?

Some conditional compilation by #if(def)ing some *GMIME* macro...

While doing something else I passed by these messages:

http://www.mail-archive.com/notmuch at notmuchmail.org/msg05829.html
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=269819

These seems to provide valuable information to anyone attempting
to compile notmuch with gmime 2.5+

Tomi

Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Tomi Ollila]

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken 
 wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante 
>  wrote:
> > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> > Fedora 16.
> 
> Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)
> 
> And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread
> F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API
> differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't
> part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.
> 
> What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is
> 2.6 officially out there and stable?

Some conditional compilation by #if(def)ing some *GMIME* macro...

While doing something else I passed by these messages:

http://www.mail-archive.com/notmuch@notmuchmail.org/msg05829.html
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=269819

These seems to provide valuable information to anyone attempting
to compile notmuch with gmime 2.5+

Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Darren McGuicken]

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante  wrote:
> I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> Fedora 16.

Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)

And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread
F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API
differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't
part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.

What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is
2.6 officially out there and stable?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 

Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Peter Portante]

Is there a good test suite for notmuch?

I'll take a crack at it using the latest 0.11 sources and see how far I get.

Thanks, -peter

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins <
jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante <
> peter.a.portante at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
> > Fedora 16:
> >
> > [pportant at frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
> > Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
> > CC -O2 debugger.o
> > In file included from debugger.c:21:0:
> > notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name
> 'GMimeSignatureValidity'
> > notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCipherContext'
> > make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1
> >
> > It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remove
> > the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and
> > renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext.
>
> Hey, Peter.  Unfortunately notmuch is not yet compatible with gmime 2.6.
> gmime 2.5, which is apparently what's in Fedora 16, is the experimental
> release of the 2.6 interface.
>
> Updating notmuch to work with gmime 2.6 has been on the todo list for a
> while now, and it's obviously getting more urgent.  I've been planning
> on looking into it at it as soon as I can, but if anyone else wants to
> take a crack at it, I'll be happy to review patches.
>
> jamie.
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Peter Portante]

Hello folks,

I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
Fedora 16:

[pportant at frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
CC -O2 debugger.o
In file included from debugger.c:21:0:
notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeSignatureValidity'
notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCipherContext'
make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1

It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remove 
the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and 
renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext.

Am I doing something wrong here? Using the wrong version of notmuch 
sources with Fedora 16? Or do I need to get gmime 2.4 installed? I have 
gmime.x86_64 2.5.8-1.fc16 installed, and it appears that provides the 
v2.6 include files for gmime (go figure).

Could there be work already done to solve this?

Thanks, -peter
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Jameson Graef Rollins]

On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:36:32 -0500, Peter Portante  
wrote:
> Is there a good test suite for notmuch?

Hey, Peter.  Yes, there is a very good, extensive test suite for
notmuch.  It can be run with "make test"

jamie.


pgpwREjQW5rsd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Jameson Graef Rollins]

On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:36:32 -0500, Peter Portante  wrote:
> Is there a good test suite for notmuch?

Hey, Peter.  Yes, there is a very good, extensive test suite for
notmuch.  It can be run with "make test"

jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 

Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Darren McGuicken]

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante  
wrote:
> I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> Fedora 16.

Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)

And it's nothing you're doing wrong, per my reply to the other thread
F16 is using the current development version of gmime which has API
differences with the stable version 2.4.  The patch that exists isn't
part of standard notmuch since it in turn breaks 2.4 compatibility.

What's the right way to handle this?  I see 2.6 tarballs on gnome... is
2.6 officially out there and stable?


pgpj2i0FALUjb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Peter Portante]

Is there a good test suite for notmuch?

I'll take a crack at it using the latest 0.11 sources and see how far I get.

Thanks, -peter

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins <
jroll...@finestructure.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante <
> peter.a.porta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
> > Fedora 16:
> >
> > [pportant@frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
> > Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
> > CC -O2 debugger.o
> > In file included from debugger.c:21:0:
> > notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name
> 'GMimeSignatureValidity'
> > notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCipherContext'
> > make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1
> >
> > It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remove
> > the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and
> > renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext.
>
> Hey, Peter.  Unfortunately notmuch is not yet compatible with gmime 2.6.
> gmime 2.5, which is apparently what's in Fedora 16, is the experimental
> release of the 2.6 interface.
>
> Updating notmuch to work with gmime 2.6 has been on the todo list for a
> while now, and it's obviously getting more urgent.  I've been planning
> on looking into it at it as soon as I can, but if anyone else wants to
> take a crack at it, I'll be happy to review patches.
>
> jamie.
>
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Re: Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Jameson Graef Rollins]

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante  
wrote:
> I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> Fedora 16:
> 
> [pportant@frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
> Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
> CC -O2 debugger.o
> In file included from debugger.c:21:0:
> notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeSignatureValidity'
> notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCipherContext'
> make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1
> 
> It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remove 
> the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and 
> renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext.

Hey, Peter.  Unfortunately notmuch is not yet compatible with gmime 2.6.
gmime 2.5, which is apparently what's in Fedora 16, is the experimental
release of the 2.6 interface.

Updating notmuch to work with gmime 2.6 has been on the todo list for a
while now, and it's obviously getting more urgent.  I've been planning
on looking into it at it as soon as I can, but if anyone else wants to
take a crack at it, I'll be happy to review patches.

jamie.


pgpXuWg54H7ye.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Jameson Graef Rollins]

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante  wrote:
> I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
> able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
> Fedora 16:
> 
> [pportant at frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
> Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
> CC -O2 debugger.o
> In file included from debugger.c:21:0:
> notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeSignatureValidity'
> notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCipherContext'
> make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1
> 
> It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remove 
> the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and 
> renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext.

Hey, Peter.  Unfortunately notmuch is not yet compatible with gmime 2.6.
gmime 2.5, which is apparently what's in Fedora 16, is the experimental
release of the 2.6 interface.

Updating notmuch to work with gmime 2.6 has been on the todo list for a
while now, and it's obviously getting more urgent.  I've been planning
on looking into it at it as soon as I can, but if anyone else wants to
take a crack at it, I'll be happy to review patches.

jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 

Regarding notmuch and Fedora 16

[Peter Portante]

Hello folks,

I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been 
able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under 
Fedora 16:


   [pportant@frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
   Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
   CC -O2 debugger.o
   In file included from debugger.c:21:0:
   notmuch-client.h:72:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeSignatureValidity'
   notmuch-client.h:86:5: error: unknown type name 'GMimeCipherContext'
   make: *** [debugger.o] Error 1

It appears that with GMime v2.6 (from v2.4), a change was made to remove 
the use of GMimeSignatureValidity in favor of GMimeSignatureList, and 
renamed GMimeCipherContext to GMimeCryptoContext.


Am I doing something wrong here? Using the wrong version of notmuch 
sources with Fedora 16? Or do I need to get gmime 2.4 installed? I have 
gmime.x86_64 2.5.8-1.fc16 installed, and it appears that provides the 
v2.6 include files for gmime (go figure).


Could there be work already done to solve this?

Thanks, -peter
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch