On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:27:35 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:00:08 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > All of the authors appear in the output already, but that doesn't seem
> > to be the case of the subjects. Would you envisage doing something
> > similar to the changes Dirk made
On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:27:35 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:00:08 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > All of the authors appear in the output already, but that doesn't seem
> > to be the case of the subjects. Would you envisage doing something
> > similar to the changes Dirk made
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:00:08 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> All of the authors appear in the output already, but that doesn't seem
> to be the case of the subjects. Would you envisage doing something
> similar to the changes Dirk made for authors?
Right. We do have a similar approach already for
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:00:08 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> All of the authors appear in the output already, but that doesn't seem
> to be the case of the subjects. Would you envisage doing something
> similar to the changes Dirk made for authors?
Right. We do have a similar approach already for
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:42:48 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Next, I wonder if we shouldn't do something similar for the search
> view. It might be quite handy if all authors and all unique subjects for
> a thread were made available for i-search in the buffer, but hidden by
> default and expanded as n
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:42:48 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Next, I wonder if we shouldn't do something similar for the search
> view. It might be quite handy if all authors and all unique subjects for
> a thread were made available for i-search in the buffer, but hidden by
> default and expanded as n