Re: provide elpa packages

2016-11-26 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sat, Nov 26 2016, David Bremner  wrote:

> Tomi Ollila  writes:
>
>>
>> (you could amend copying Makefile.global for out of tree builds -- or use
>> include $(srcdir)/Makefile.global)
>>
>
> OK, I did that, and pushed to master and release. BTW, the next line
> still looks problematic for oot builds? Did not test...

oot builds (and tests) works fine with that and my patches applied.

Tomi

>
> d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: provide elpa packages

2016-11-26 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila  writes:

>
> (you could amend copying Makefile.global for out of tree builds -- or use
> include $(srcdir)/Makefile.global)
>

OK, I did that, and pushed to master and release. BTW, the next line
still looks problematic for oot builds? Did not test...

d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: provide elpa packages

2016-11-25 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Fri, Nov 25 2016, Tomi Ollila  wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 19 2016, David Bremner  wrote:
>
>> This is an answer to the discussion we were having on irc the other day 
>> about easily installing the emacs front-end for a single user.
>>
>> For users of package.el supporting emacs (iirc, emacs 24.1+), you can
>>
>> 1) make elpa
>> 2) From within emacs M-x package-install-file  
>> the-tarball-produced-in-step-1 
>>
>> That's it, no modifications of paths etc... required.
>>
>> [PATCH 1/2] build: Move variable definitions to Makefile.global
>>
>> This looks big, but it's just code movement. Of course with makefiles
>> moving things around is not without peril, so test builds in various
>> corner cases (e.g. not current Debian) would be a good idea
>
> Series LGTM (especially Makefile.global)

(you could amend copying Makefile.global for out of tree builds -- or use
include $(srcdir)/Makefile.global)

>
> Worked without hiccups on SL6.2)
>
> Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: provide elpa packages

2016-11-25 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sat, Nov 19 2016, David Bremner  wrote:

> This is an answer to the discussion we were having on irc the other day about 
> easily installing the emacs front-end for a single user.
>
> For users of package.el supporting emacs (iirc, emacs 24.1+), you can
>
> 1) make elpa
> 2) From within emacs M-x package-install-file  
> the-tarball-produced-in-step-1 
>
> That's it, no modifications of paths etc... required.
>
> [PATCH 1/2] build: Move variable definitions to Makefile.global
>
> This looks big, but it's just code movement. Of course with makefiles
> moving things around is not without peril, so test builds in various
> corner cases (e.g. not current Debian) would be a good idea

Series LGTM (especially Makefile.global)

Worked without hiccups on SL6.2)

Tomi
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


provide elpa packages

2016-11-19 Thread David Bremner
This is an answer to the discussion we were having on irc the other day about 
easily installing the emacs front-end for a single user.

For users of package.el supporting emacs (iirc, emacs 24.1+), you can

1) make elpa
2) From within emacs M-x package-install-file  
the-tarball-produced-in-step-1 

That's it, no modifications of paths etc... required.

[PATCH 1/2] build: Move variable definitions to Makefile.global

This looks big, but it's just code movement. Of course with makefiles
moving things around is not without peril, so test builds in various
corner cases (e.g. not current Debian) would be a good idea

___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch