Re: public-inbox, nmbug or Debbugs and notmuch sync?

Hi, On Mon, 09 May 2022 at 16:07, David Bremner wrote: > I talked to the public-inbox author at some point about using notmuch, > but perl bindings were a hard requirement for that. I don't know of and > other interest in perl bindings, and especially no volunteers to > maintain them, so that id

Re: public-inbox, nmbug or Debbugs and notmuch sync?

zimoun writes: > > Somehow, I would like to have a bridge: keep Emacs+Notmuch but index > emails with another format (backend) than maildir as > public-inbox-v2-format. It would avoid data duplication and/or > conversion. > > 1: > I talked

Re: public-inbox, nmbug or Debbugs and notmuch sync?

Hi David, Thanks for the answer. On Mon, 09 May 2022 at 12:15, David Bremner wrote: > zimoun writes: >> 2. Notmuch is strongly linked to the Maildir format as storage but Git >> seems an efficient way to exchange and sync across several machines; for >> instance using the tool grokmirror [4

Re: public-inbox, nmbug or Debbugs and notmuch sync?

zimoun writes: > > Currently, I synchronize my various Notmuch database using ’muchsync’ > [1] which works well enough for my needs. Although I am not completely > satisfied. > > Well, I have read this thread, starting at [2]: > > WIP: promote nmbug to user sync tool > id:2022042

public-inbox, nmbug or Debbugs and notmuch sync?

Hi, I used Emacs and Notmuch to deal with many public lists. Thanks! It helps a lot. These days, I am switching from the “subscription“ way to a “fetch” way via public-inbox thanks to Kyle’s instance – I mainly follow Guix. Currently, I synchronize my various Notmuch datab