On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest
> is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it
> is not rebased to the current master.
Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a
dump/delete/
On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> "Decode headers in reply"
> (id:1267602656-24940-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz) is another
> patch, which is quite essential to me. Am I the only one here, who needs
> to reply to messages with non-ASCII characters?
Nope, and it looks currently very ugly
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest
> > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz, but it
> > is not rebased to the current master.
>
> Not sure what I am d
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:46:01 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> A very lovely change, Jesse! Thanks for this (which is now pushed). And
> again, thanks to Sebastian for guiding the patch through the file
> renaming.
Great to hear! Sorry I've been off of email, and still only have
sporadic access. However
On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote:
> If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are
> given, return the total number of messages in the database.
I know that cworth was concerned about this syntax on IRC as that would
mean that "notmuch show" would have to spew out all your email
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:10:38 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:07:40 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> I think this feature is very useful, and that the region is definitely
> an appropriate way to implement it, (doing region-based operations is
> very natural for emacs users). M
On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> > have in place:
> >
> > * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This
> > is stuff that I'll w
I want to figure out how to make a release process that will work for
notmuch. An idea I have now is to use a date-based "merge window" during
which features are nominated for the release.
So I took a window starting at my original request for 0.2 features
until now. In our current (lame) syntax f
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:23:27 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> For my merge window, I also want something that can't be obtained
> today. I want to see all threads that contain at least one message
> that matches my date range and at least one message that doesn't
> have the "merged"
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
> On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > "Decode headers in reply"
> > (id:1267602656-24940-1-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz) is another
> > patch, which is quite essential to me. Am I the only one here, who needs
> > to reply to m
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:01:35 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
> On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote:
> > If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are
> > given, return the total number of messages in the database.
>
> I know that cworth was concerned about this syntax on IRC as
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:07:27 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >
> > This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today.
> > When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors
> > were always displayed in chronological order. But if o
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 02:23, Carl Worth wrote:
> 3. Ability to easily post search results to a web page.
Isn't that a job for "noneatall" [0] -- maybe it just needs the
ability to export to static pages, that can be rsync'ed somewhere?
[0] http://github.com/dme/noneatall
> 4. Fancy support
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 23:01, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote:
>> If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are
>> given, return the total number of messages in the database.
> I know that cworth was concerned about this syntax on IRC as that would
>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:28:32 -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
> [0] Not much, afaics! [1]
> [1] Man, what are the chances that will ever get old? [0]
Thanks AJ, I like it!
-Mark
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:23:27 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > For my merge window, I also want something that can't be obtained
> > today. I want to see all threads that contain at least one message
> > that matches my date range a
The new functions first check if an external poll script has been defined in
the variable 'notmuch-external-refresh-script and if yes, runs that script
before executing the existing refresh function (which is bound to '=')
This can be used to have 'G' mimic the mutt behavior of polling an externa
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 05:28:32 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> What's wrong with having them inconsistent in this one respect? [0]
>
> $ notmuch count
> 96632
> $ notmuch search
> Error: notmuch search requires at least one search term.
This seems very logical and intuitive behavior in my opinion.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 05:28:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> What's wrong with having them inconsistent in this one respect?
>
> $ notmuch count
> 96632
> $ notmuch search
> Error: notmuch search requires at least one search term.
>
> ...seems pretty logical behaviour to me?
My thoughts exac
We now go through the following searches in order:
0) one of the users addresses was in a To: or Cc: header
1) check for an Envelope-to: header that matches one of the addresses
2) check for an X-Original-To: header that matches one of the addresses
3) check for a (for ) clause in Received: header
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:19:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:01:35 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth"
> wrote:
> > 1) I often want to know how many mails are in my db. "notmuch count" or
> > "notmuch count *" is the intuitive syntax I would use for that. Right
> > now there is no way
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:01:09 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> Great to hear! Sorry I've been off of email, and still only have
> sporadic access. However, one question: it looks like it was V2 of the
> patch that you pushed -- was it? Unfortunately, there was a subtle bug
> that kept on popping up
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:39:38 -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
> If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are
> given, return the total number of messages in the database.
How much syntax should count require to print all messages? [*]
I've pushed this out now, along with some follo
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:07:27 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> > >
> > > This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today.
> > > When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors
> > > w
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:49:22 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> I have modified the patch slightly and I think that it could solve the
> above points. The release process should be modified this way: you skip
> point 5 (increment the notmuch version in Makefile.l
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:53:59 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I think that using | as a separator would help here. Let's say that
> initially we have "Matched Author, Non Matched, Matched Again" we can
> tranform this to "Matched Author, Matched Again| Non Matched". This way,
> the length of the stri
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth"
> wrote:
>
> > No patch yet, just asking if this is a good idea or not.
Yes. A fine idea.
> I think it's a very good idea. But it should be something that includes
> the other compo
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth"
> wrote:
> > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > Perhaps Carl should get more Nørwég¡añ friends, :-).
>
> Or Görmän or 中文
Are you all trying to show a problem here? All of the above comes
through fine. Perhaps it's only with non-ASCII
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:55:17 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> So I propose something like:
>
> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux)
+1
/D
--
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
notmuch mailing list
here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
/D
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:06:09 -0700, Carl n∅tmuch 䚳 Worth
wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth"
> > wrote:
> > > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > > Perhaps Carl should get more Nørwég¡añ friends, :-).
> >
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth ,
that's not pretty... nor readable.
/D
--
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center
_
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 00:03, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> Presumably others must be annoyed about having to manually "read" and
> archive all their sent mail, unless there's some other way that people
> having been dealing with this that I'm not aware of.
I haven't switched over to notmuch properly
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 00:03, Jameson Rollins
> wrote:
> > Presumably others must be annoyed about having to manually "read" and
> > archive all their sent mail, unless there's some other way that people
> > having been dealing with this that I'm not awa
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> * Anything else that people want, (especially things that already
> exist and that you're already using). Support for maildir flags on
> import would be great here. I'm still waiting to see a complete
> solution I think.
>
> So keep the patche
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today.
> When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors
> were always displayed in chronological order. But if only part of the
> thread matches the query, that may or may not be
On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest
> is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz, but it
> is not rebased to the current master.
Not sure what I am doing wrong, but with this patch even after a
dump/dele
On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> "Decode headers in reply"
> (id:1267602656-24940-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz) is another
> patch, which is quite essential to me. Am I the only one here, who needs
> to reply to messages with non-ASCII characters?
Nope, and it looks currently very u
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On 2010-04-08, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > I think that the patch you sent was not the latest version. The latest
> > is in id:1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz, but it
> > is not rebased to the current master.
>
> Not sure what I a
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:46:01 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> A very lovely change, Jesse! Thanks for this (which is now pushed). And
> again, thanks to Sebastian for guiding the patch through the file
> renaming.
Great to hear! Sorry I've been off of email, and still only have
sporadic access. However
On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote:
> If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are
> given, return the total number of messages in the database.
I know that cworth was concerned about this syntax on IRC as that would
mean that "notmuch show" would have to spew out all your email
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:10:38 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:07:40 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> I think this feature is very useful, and that the region is definitely
> an appropriate way to implement it, (doing region-based operations is
> very natural for emacs users). M
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/87775488/attachment.pgp>
hat
I'm aware of.)
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/a636756d/attachment.pgp>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/614ad6ad/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > "Decode headers in reply"
> > (id:1267602656-24940-1-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz) is another
> > patch, which is quite essential to me. Am I the only one here, who needs
> > to reply to
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:01:35 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> On 2010-04-08, Mike Kelly wrote:
> > If no parameters are given to notmuch-count, or just '' or '*' are
> > given, return the total number of messages in the database.
>
> I know that cworth was concerned about this syntax on IRC as
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:07:27 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >
> > This is based in part on some discussion on IRC today.
> > When a thread is displayed in the search results, previously the authors
> > were always displayed in chronological order. But if o
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:28:32 -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
> [0] Not much, afaics! [1]
> [1] Man, what are the chances that will ever get old? [0]
Thanks AJ, I like it!
-Mark
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:23:27 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > For my merge window, I also want something that can't be obtained
> > today. I want to see all threads that contain at least one message
> > that matches my date range a
The new functions first check if an external poll script has been defined in
the variable 'notmuch-external-refresh-script and if yes, runs that script
before executing the existing refresh function (which is bound to '=')
This can be used to have 'G' mimic the mutt behavior of polling an externa
s
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/7fdc2777/attachment-0001.pgp>
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 05:28:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> What's wrong with having them inconsistent in this one respect?
>
> $ notmuch count
> 96632
> $ notmuch search
> Error: notmuch search requires at least one search term.
>
> ...seems pretty logical behaviour to me?
My thoughts exac
We now go through the following searches in order:
0) one of the users addresses was in a To: or Cc: header
1) check for an Envelope-to: header that matches one of the addresses
2) check for an X-Original-To: header that matches one of the addresses
3) check for a (for ) clause in Received: header
h count to be or not to be
-Carl
OK, we need a simpler search syntax than that...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/34915629/attachment.pgp>
ges I should apply
here.
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/45d20b5e/attachment.pgp>
was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/8a4006c2/attachment.pgp>
ation/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/c7d97b79/attachment-0001.pgp>
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:53:59 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I think that using | as a separator would help here. Let's say that
> initially we have "Matched Author, Non Matched, Matched Again" we can
> tranform this to "Matched Author, Matched Again| Non Matched". This way,
> the length of the stri
ling a patch to generate that, that
would be great.
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/8afe7571/attachment.pgp>
-
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100409/f9fa2828/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:55:17 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> So I propose something like:
>
> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux)
+1
/D
--
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center
here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
/D
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:06:09 -0700, Carl n?tmuch ? Worth
wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:35:07 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" > SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> > > On 2010-04-09, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > > Perhaps Carl should get more N?rw?g?a? friends,
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:44:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
>
> here's what's going wrong. Look at the To: line...
Carl =?UTF-8?b?buKIhXRtdWNoIOSasw==?= Worth ,
that's not pretty... nor readable.
/D
--
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center
63 matches
Mail list logo
