Frank LENORMAND writes:
> For example, 0.30.1, with the first two numbers coming from the main
> repository, and the last one acting as major for the bindings.
>
> 0.29.3 → 0.29.1
> 0.30-rc2 → 0.30.1-rc2
> etc.
>
I'm mainly interested in supporting two use cases for notmuch: building
everything
On Sat, Jun 20 2020, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * Tomi Ollila:
>
>> imo.the completions should primarily provide convenience to the
>> interactive user, to see all possible options (also those
>> seldomly.used) one can use help and namual pages...
>
> "Can use" being the operative term, not "should
On Tue 23 Jun 2020 at 13:43 +0300, Frank LENORMAND wrote:
> On Tue Jun 23 12:33:36 2020, David Bremner wrote:
>> Frank LENORMAND writes:
>> > For example, 0.30.1, with the first two numbers coming from the main
>> > repository, and the last one acting as major for the bindings.
>> >
>> > 0.29.3
* Tomi Ollila:
> You're wrong and I am right... ;)
"I'm sorry, if you were right, I would agree with you." (Dr. M. Sayer) :-)
> note that I also have no notmuch-* commands in my PATH, so 'notm'
> expands to 'notmuch ' ! \o/ FTW ;)
I like aliases like "nme" for "Notmuch in Emacs".
-Ralph
David Bremner writes:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> I know, I know, I don't use 32 bit architectures either. However...
>>
>> Looking at [1], it looks like there two tests consistently failing on 32
>> bit architectures (and also mips64el, FWIW).
>
> Hmm. Somewhere between when I sent this
