On Wed 2018-05-09 14:42:35 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I avoided #if'ing out these sections because i thought the general
> strategy was to avoid preprocessor shenanigans where possible, as it
> makes the code harder to think about given the combinatorial explosion
> of #define options.
On Tue 2018-05-01 22:36:31 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>
>> +
>> +if (params->crypto.decrypt == NOTMUCH_DECRYPT_TRUE &&
>> session_key_count_error == NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
>> +unsigned int new_session_keys = 0;
>> +if
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> +
> +if (params->crypto.decrypt == NOTMUCH_DECRYPT_TRUE &&
> session_key_count_error == NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> + unsigned int new_session_keys = 0;
> + if (notmuch_message_count_properties (message, "session-key",
>
If the number of session keys for a given message increased after
running "notmuch show" then we just learned something new that might
let us do automatic decryption. We should reindex this message using
our newfound knowledge.
---
notmuch-show.c | 20
1 file changed, 20