[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ben Gamari [2010.01.29.0949 +1300]: > > I guess I just dislike having to run notmuch new regularly, > > rather than integrating the database more closely with the mail > > flow. > > > Sounds like you need to add a line to crontab. It still feels like a hack. It's a bit like making ma

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes [2010.01.29.0132 +1300]: > >> [tags] > >> inbox = +inbox,+unread > >> sent = +sent > >> drafts = +draft > >> archive = -inbox > > > > This proposal, on the other hand, is an interesting one, but when is > > it supposed to happen? It just feels wrong to make this

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.01.28.1834 +1300]: > > That's not going to work so well if so. > > Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin... Now I get it. I was talking about id:20100114084713.GA22273 at harikalardiyari Sorry, I *am* new to notmuch ;) -- martin | http://madduck.net/

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Jed Brown
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:49:34 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > Sounds like you need to add a line to crontab. I haven't been following this thread closely so I hope this isn't too out of context. I agree that certain things like notmuch-new should go in the crontab, but I think that notmuch-new should

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:34:21 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach James Westby [2010.01.28.1828 > +1300]: > > Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to > > notmuch show to see the conversation? > > > > That's not going to work so well if so. > > Why not? Works fine

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach James Westby [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]: > Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to > notmuch show to see the conversation? > > That's not going to work so well if so. Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin... -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.s

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Thu Jan 28 17:17:35 -0500 2010: > Cron-scheduling is a regular activity. I am talking about > event-based scheduling. incron could do that and fire up a process > every time a message is dropped into a directory, but notmuch > doesn't provide me with an in

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:52 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.27.0603 > +1300]: > > > This is getting involved. > > > > > > Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these > > > complex and > > > context-sensitive decisions be delegated

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.27.0603 +1300]: > > This is getting involved. > > > > Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex > > and > > context-sensitive decisions be delegated to sub-processes? ala git hooks? > > I think this idea is completely inde

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.26.1046 +1300]: > > For example, I might have: > > > > ~/.notmuch-config: > > > > [database] > > path=/home/pioto/mail > > ... > > [tags] > > pioto at pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch > > > > So, a 'tags' section, where each ke

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Thu Jan 28 15:39:10 -0500 2010: > also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes [2010.01.29.0132 > +1300]: > > >> [tags] > > >> inbox = +inbox,+unread > > >> sent = +sent > > >> drafts = +draft > > >> archive = -inbox > > > > > > This proposal, on the other hand, is

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Thu Jan 28 17:17:35 -0500 2010: > Cron-scheduling is a regular activity. I am talking about > event-based scheduling. incron could do that and fire up a process > every time a message is dropped into a directory, but notmuch > doesn't provide me with an in

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Jed Brown
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:49:34 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > Sounds like you need to add a line to crontab. I haven't been following this thread closely so I hope this isn't too out of context. I agree that certain things like notmuch-new should go in the crontab, but I think that notmuch-new should

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ben Gamari [2010.01.29.0949 +1300]: > > I guess I just dislike having to run notmuch new regularly, > > rather than integrating the database more closely with the mail > > flow. > > > Sounds like you need to add a line to crontab. It still feels like a hack. It's a bit like making ma

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Thu Jan 28 15:39:10 -0500 2010: > also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes [2010.01.29.0132 > +1300]: > > >> [tags] > > >> inbox = +inbox,+unread > > >> sent = +sent > > >> drafts = +draft > > >> archive = -inbox > > > > > > This proposal, on the other hand, is

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes [2010.01.29.0132 +1300]: > >> [tags] > >> inbox = +inbox,+unread > >> sent = +sent > >> drafts = +draft > >> archive = -inbox > > > > This proposal, on the other hand, is an interesting one, but when is > > it supposed to happen? It just feels wrong to make this h

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Servilio Afre Puentes
2010/1/28 martin f krafft : > also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.26.1046 > +1300]: >> > For example, I might have: >> > >> > ~/.notmuch-config: >> > >> > ? ? [database] >> > ? ? path=/home/pioto/mail >> > ? ? ... >> > ? ? [tags] >> > ? ? pioto at pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch >> >

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread Servilio Afre Puentes
2010/1/28 martin f krafft : > also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.26.1046 > +1300]: >> > For example, I might have: >> > >> > ~/.notmuch-config: >> > >> >     [database] >> >     path=/home/pioto/mail >> >     ... >> >     [tags] >> >     pi...@pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch >> > >>

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.01.28.1834 +1300]: > > That's not going to work so well if so. > > Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin... Now I get it. I was talking about id:20100114084713.ga22...@harikalardiyari Sorry, I *am* new to notmuch ;) -- martin | http://madduck.net/ |

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:34:21 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach James Westby [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]: > > Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to > > notmuch show to see the conversation? > > > > That's not going to work so well if so. > > Why not? Works fine for

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach James Westby [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]: > Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to > notmuch show to see the conversation? > > That's not going to work so well if so. Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin... -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.s

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:52 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.27.0603 > +1300]: > > > This is getting involved. > > > > > > Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these > > > complex and > > > context-sensitive decisions be delegated

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.27.0603 +1300]: > > This is getting involved. > > > > Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex > > and > > context-sensitive decisions be delegated to sub-processes? ala git hooks? > > I think this idea is completely inde

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.26.1046 +1300]: > > For example, I might have: > > > > ~/.notmuch-config: > > > > [database] > > path=/home/pioto/mail > > ... > > [tags] > > pi...@pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch > > > > So, a 'tags' section, where each key i

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-26 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:32:02 -0600, Scott Robinson wrote: > Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Mon Jan 25 15:46:55 -0600 2010: > > I think this idea is a really good one and I would like to pursue it as > > a tangent thread here. I was going to propose something very similar to > > this.

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-26 Thread Scott Robinson
Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Mon Jan 25 15:46:55 -0600 2010: > I think this idea is a really good one and I would like to pursue it as > a tangent thread here. I was going to propose something very similar to > this. I think it's a very flexible idea that would help in a lot of > wa

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-26 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:32:02 -0600, Scott Robinson wrote: > Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Mon Jan 25 15:46:55 -0600 2010: > > I think this idea is a really good one and I would like to pursue it as > > a tangent thread here. I was going to propose something very similar to > > this.

Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-26 Thread Scott Robinson
Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Mon Jan 25 15:46:55 -0600 2010: > I think this idea is a really good one and I would like to pursue it as > a tangent thread here. I was going to propose something very similar to > this. I think it's a very flexible idea that would help in a lot of > wa

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-25 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:22:47 -0500 (EST), Mike Kelly wrote: > Similarly, provide a mechanism for correlating the folder name with > some set of tags, and change those tags as messages are moved around. > > For example, I might have: > > ~/.notmuch-config: > > [database] > path=/ho

[notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object store]

2010-01-25 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:22:47 -0500 (EST), Mike Kelly wrote: > Similarly, provide a mechanism for correlating the folder name with > some set of tags, and change those tags as messages are moved around. > > For example, I might have: > > ~/.notmuch-config: > > [database] > path=/ho