, and then runs notmuch search and notmuch show
. The former shows the subject of the first message, and the latter
the subject of the second message.
Best wishes
Mark
#!/usr/bin/env bash
test_description='Do duplicate message ids get shown in arrival order'
. ./test-lib.sh ||
.@example.com [filename]=copy2 [date]="Fri, 05 Jan
2001 15:43:52 +"'
cat < EXPECTED
[
[
diff --git a/test/T670-duplicate-mid.sh b/test/T670-duplicate-mid.sh
index ced28a21..137cb6a5 100755
--- a/test/T670-duplicate-mid.sh
+++ b/test/T670-duplicate-mid.sh
@@ -5,8 +5,14
-duplicate-mid.sh
@@ -5,6 +5,13 @@ test_description="duplicate message ids"
add_message '[id]="duplicate"' '[subject]="message 1" [filename]=copy1'
add_message '[id]="duplicate"' '[subject]="message 2" [filenam
ge
>> files with duplicate message-ids". that's a bit odd, no?
>
> Yes, I agree that's a bit strange. We should make some effort to
> display the subject that belongs with a given message body. I think it's
> not too hard [1] to preserve the old behaviour of ke
give it a subject "Re: [patch v3 06/12] lib: do *not* index message
> files with duplicate message-ids". that's a bit odd, no?
Yes, I agree that's a bit strange. We should make some effort to
display the subject that belongs with a given message body. I think it's
not to
the current message with another
message with Message-Id: 20170604123235.24466-7-da...@tethera.net and
give it a subject "Re: [patch v3 06/12] lib: do *not* index message
files with duplicate message-ids". that's a bit odd, no?
I'm not saying it's wrong, i'm just hoping t
The corresponding xapian document just gets more terms added to it,
but this doesn't seem to break anything. Values on the other hand get
overwritten, which is a bit annoying, but arguably it is not worse to
take the values (from, subject, date) from the last file indexed
rather than the first.
---
The corresponding xapian document just gets more terms added to it,
but this doesn't seem to break anything. Values on the other hand get
overwritten, which is a bit annoying, but arguably it is not worse to
take the values (from, subject, date) from the last file indexed
rather than the first.
---
The corresponding xapian document just gets more terms added to it,
but this doesn't seem to break anything. Values on the other hand get
overwritten, which is a bit annoying, but arguably it is not worse to
take the values (from, subject, date) from the last file indexed
rather than the first.
---
The corresponding xapian document just gets more terms added to it,
but this doesn't seem to break anything. Values on the other hand get
overwritten, which is a bit annoying, but arguably it is not worse to
take the values (from, subject, date) from the last file indexed
rather than the first.
---
+2,10 @@
test_description="duplicate message ids"
. ./test-lib.sh || exit 1
-add_message '[id]="id:duplicate"' '[subject]="message 1"'
-add_message '[id]="id:duplicate"' '[subject]="message 2"'
+add_message &
+2,10 @@
test_description="duplicate message ids"
. ./test-lib.sh || exit 1
-add_message '[id]="id:duplicate"' '[subject]="message 1"'
-add_message '[id]="id:duplicate"' '[subject]="message 2"'
+add_message &
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>
>> On Wed 2017-03-15 21:57:28 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>>> The corresponding xapian document just gets more terms added to it,
>>> but this doesn't seem to break anything.
>>
>> this is an interesting suggestion. thanks
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Thu 2017-03-16 20:34:22 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>>> 0) what happens when one of the files gets deleted from the message
>>> store? do the terms it contributes get removed from the index?
>>
>> That's a good guestion, and an
On Thu 2017-03-16 20:34:22 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>> 0) what happens when one of the files gets deleted from the message
>> store? do the terms it contributes get removed from the index?
>
> That's a good guestion, and an issue I hadn't thought about.
> Curr
Hi
Just a comment on your last point:
> It also occurs to me that one of the things i'd love to have is
> well-indexed notes about any given e-mail. So if this was adopted, i
> could presumably just write a file that has the same Message-Id as the
> message, put my notes in it, and index it. t
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Wed 2017-03-15 21:57:28 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>> The corresponding xapian document just gets more terms added to it,
>> but this doesn't seem to break anything.
>
> this is an interesting suggestion. thanks for proposing it!
>
> A couple questions:
>
> 0)
On Wed 2017-03-15 21:57:28 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> The corresponding xapian document just gets more terms added to it,
> but this doesn't seem to break anything.
this is an interesting suggestion. thanks for proposing it!
A couple questions:
0) what happens when one of the files gets del
The corresponding xapian document just gets more terms added to it,
but this doesn't seem to break anything.
---
lib/database.cc| 3 +++
test/T670-duplicate-mid.sh | 1 -
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/database.cc b/lib/database.cc
index a679cbab..e83
19 matches
Mail list logo
