On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> > (define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "d"
> > (lambda ()
> > "delete thread and advance"
> > (interactive)
> > (notmuch-search-add-tag "deleted")
> > (forward-line)))
> ...
>
> This only works if you've already loade
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:05:58 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > I agree with you in that in many cases tags can be replaced by saved
> > searches. Last time I did it, i.e. used saved searches to distinguish
> > messages from different mailing lists, the r
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:34:38 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it
> > helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would
> > remove every tag from the th
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
>boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
>add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is
>impossible to find.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it
> helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would
> remove every tag from the thread, so you keep asking "where was the mail
> in my inbox that I have
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error
> messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal
> with that or does it simply work for you?
DOH, nothing that a (require 'notmuch) couldn't fix
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:13:26 -0500, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
> > have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by "mail you can't find".
>
> It sounds like thi
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error
> messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal
> with that or does it simply work for you?
I have:
(require 'notmuch)
in my config file be
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:33:33 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I agree that the function currently bound to space bar is annoying. I
> am actually in the middle of preparing a patch to fix this. I think
> that space should just scroll through the open messages. I don't want
> it to archive anythin
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
> have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by "mail you can't find".
It sounds like this would just as easily be accomplished with a way to
search for all mes
> I think you guys may have a misunderstanding about how notmuch indexes
> mail. Notmuch indexes multiple headers (To, From, Subject, Date) and
> the *entire* body of the message. That's kind of the whole point. In
> other words, messages don't have to have tags in order to be found.
[...]
N
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:43:38 +0100, Cédric Cabessa wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2010 16:23:58 Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
> >boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
> >add a tag, and then "a
On Friday 12 November 2010 16:23:58 Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
>boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
>add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is
>impossible to find.
I
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:05:58 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I agree with you in that in many cases tags can be replaced by saved
> searches. Last time I did it, i.e. used saved searches to distinguish
> messages from different mailing lists, the result was that it took
> very long time (something li
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
> > want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom
> > "user" tag to a message, and if so asks y
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:48:12 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> It is just a way to ensure that all your mails are properly filed, and
> file them quickly.
We should just add a hook that you can use, then.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
___
not
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:05:23 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
> >boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
> >add a tag, and then
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
>boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
>add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is
>impossible to find.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> I prefer to add tags, for the following reasons:
It sounds like we do much the same things with our mail except that your
approach is quite disciplined and mine quite lazy :-)
> - If I want to search through a mailing list, I don't h
Hi, Jamie.
>
> > - I often find myself hitting the spacebar too much, which ends up with
> >some of my new messages being removed from all of their tags, which
> >make them very difficult to find. I don't think the spacebar should
> >remove the inbox tag at all. It should only chang
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:39:37 +, Darren McGuicken
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
> > want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom
> > "user" tag to a message
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
> want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom
> "user" tag to a message, and if so asks you for a tag to add before
> archiving. That way, I n
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> The emacs interface to notmuch gets in my way in at least several
> manners:
Hi, Matthieu. Here are some of the things I've done to deal with
similar issues:
> - I often find myself hitting the spacebar too much, which ends up with
23 matches
Mail list logo
