On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:47:12 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > [*] Even more simplification is possible if we stop trying to hide
> > header components. Several people have requested that To and Cc be
> > visible all the time.
>
> Hey,
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:59:36 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Your concerns appear to be about `notmuch-wash-wrap-long-lines'. I agree
> that it can generate unfortunate results in the "deep thread, narrow
> terminal" case. Are the other two functions okay?
If they had come in as separate
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:57:42 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > Hey, Carl. I had actually been meaning to bring this up. I actually
> > don't like having the headers collapsed at all, so I am definitely in
> > favor of the idea of doing away with this "feature". At the very least,
> > I would
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:47:12 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
[*] Even more simplification is possible if we stop trying to hide
header components. Several people have requested that To and Cc be
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:57:42 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Hey, Carl. I had actually been meaning to bring this up. I actually
don't like having the headers collapsed at all, so I am definitely in
favor of the idea of doing away with this feature. At the very least,
I would
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:10:15 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes wrote:
> > Showing only one (with a variable allowing you to express preference) is
> > my intention. Any non-shown parts will appear as attachments - you can
> > save them using the button (and perhaps later view them).
>
> Why not see
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:58:16 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes wrote:
> On 21 April 2010 17:03, Carl Worth wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> [...]
> > Meanwhile, another issue with the result of this series is that I now
> > seem to get rendering for both the
On 22 April 2010 08:30, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:58:16 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 21 April 2010 17:03, Carl Worth wrote:
>> > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>> [...]
>> > Meanwhile, another issue with the result of
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:03:03 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > commit 2b6201fbf9209a875f216d48c30b95a6f583c575
> >
> > emacs: Add more functions to clean up text/plain parts
> >
> > Add:
> > - notmuch-wash-wrap-long-lines: Wrap lines longer than the width of
> > the current
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Sure. Hiding a message with 'b' is visually identical to hiding it with
> RET.
That's not quite true. `b' will (would) hide only the body. If the
header is visible `b' will not hide it.
> Except that the internal mechanism is distinct, so
On 21 April 2010 17:03, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
[...]
> Meanwhile, another issue with the result of this series is that I now
> seem to get rendering for both the text/plain and the text/html
> alternatives when a message has both. For now,
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Sure. Hiding a message with 'b' is visually identical to hiding it with
RET.
That's not quite true. `b' will (would) hide only the body. If the
header is visible `b' will not hide it.
Except that the internal mechanism is
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:03:03 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
commit 2b6201fbf9209a875f216d48c30b95a6f583c575
emacs: Add more functions to clean up text/plain parts
Add:
- notmuch-wash-wrap-long-lines: Wrap lines longer than the width of
the current
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:58:16 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 April 2010 17:03, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
[...]
Meanwhile, another issue with the result of this series is that I now
On 22 April 2010 08:30, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:58:16 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes
servi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 April 2010 17:03, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
[...]
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:10:15 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Showing only one (with a variable allowing you to express preference) is
my intention. Any non-shown parts will appear as attachments - you can
save them using the button (and perhaps later view them).
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> [*] Even more simplification is possible if we stop trying to hide
> header components. Several people have requested that To and Cc be
> visible all the time.
Hey, Carl. I had actually been meaning to bring this up. I actually
don't like
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> commit 7dedc95af671173a57bafd973604614c03121ce6
>
> emacs: JSON based implementation
I merged this and followed it up immediately with a commit to remove the
ability to toggle the body visibility separate from the message
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:25:36 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> I'm currently working on the make-emacs-use-JSON patch, (it's got some
> confusion about "body visible" vs. "message visible" that I want to
> fix before pushing).
Could you describe the confusion?
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:39:50 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:25:36 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > I'm currently working on the make-emacs-use-JSON patch, (it's got some
> > confusion about "body visible" vs. "message visible" that I want to
> > fix before pushing).
>
>
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:25:36 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
I'm currently working on the make-emacs-use-JSON patch, (it's got some
confusion about body visible vs. message visible that I want to
fix before pushing).
Could you describe the confusion?
dme.
--
David Edmondson,
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:39:50 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:25:36 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
I'm currently working on the make-emacs-use-JSON patch, (it's got some
confusion about body visible vs. message visible that I want to
fix before
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
[*] Even more simplification is possible if we stop trying to hide
header components. Several people have requested that To and Cc be
visible all the time.
Hey, Carl. I had actually been meaning to bring this up. I
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
commit 7dedc95af671173a57bafd973604614c03121ce6
emacs: JSON based implementation
I merged this and followed it up immediately with a commit to remove the
ability to toggle the body visibility separate from the message
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:07:40 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > commit 8586a86b9dd4ed2406a2fbda6c08bdc6a598cfd8
> > debian: git should ignore packaging intermediate files
>
> I committed an alternate version of this, (with a new debian/.gitignore
> file). I used more wildcarding too. And I
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:07:40 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>
> I've got some misgivings about this one. First, notmuch-search-hook is
> a hook for the user to manipulate, while the hl-line-mode functionality
> is something that should be
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> This is the same set rebased onto 0.2.
Thanks for these, David!
> commit 8586a86b9dd4ed2406a2fbda6c08bdc6a598cfd8
> debian: git should ignore packaging intermediate files
I committed an alternate version of this, (with a new
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:29:29 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Carl, please consider the following (from the 'for-cworth' branch of
> git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git) for 0.2. I hope to have some more UI
> changes merged next week.
This is the same set rebased onto 0.2.
commit
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:29:29 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Carl, please consider the following (from the 'for-cworth' branch of
git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git) for 0.2. I hope to have some more UI
changes merged next week.
This is the same set rebased onto 0.2.
commit
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:07:40 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:27:39 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
I've got some misgivings about this one. First, notmuch-search-hook is
a hook for the user to manipulate, while the hl-line-mode functionality
is
Carl, please consider the following (from the 'for-cworth' branch of
git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git) for 0.2. I hope to have some more UI
changes merged next week.
commit 651f8ca16beadd658c412075a585e4ec90e31456
Author: David Edmondson
Date: Mon Mar 22 14:50:20 2010 +
Carl, please consider the following (from the 'for-cworth' branch of
git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git) for 0.2. I hope to have some more UI
changes merged next week.
commit 651f8ca16beadd658c412075a585e4ec90e31456
Author: David Edmondson d...@dme.org
Date: Mon Mar 22 14:50:20 2010 +
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:08:34 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> It's the 'for-cworth' branch of git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git.
>
> There's also a simple update to tell git to ignore notmuch-shared.
Thanks. This is pushed.
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:08:34 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
It's the 'for-cworth' branch of git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git.
There's also a simple update to tell git to ignore notmuch-shared.
Thanks. This is pushed.
-Carl
pgpRssLrxCuvt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 08:33:00 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> I'll declare common variables and 'exported' functions in
> 'notmuch-lib.el'. It may take a few days (I'm supposed to be on
> holiday).
It was quicker than expected. Using 'declare-function' in a file that is
required didn't have the
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 18:21:57 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> The warnings about unknown functions can be eliminated by use the
> declare-function macro; if you have emacs lisp reference manual (it
> required the package emacs23-common-non-dfsg on Debian) then you can
> run:
>
> ESC ESC : (info
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 18:21:57 -0300, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote:
The warnings about unknown functions can be eliminated by use the
declare-function macro; if you have emacs lisp reference manual (it
required the package emacs23-common-non-dfsg on Debian) then you can
run:
ESC ESC :
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 08:33:00 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
I'll declare common variables and 'exported' functions in
'notmuch-lib.el'. It may take a few days (I'm supposed to be on
holiday).
It was quicker than expected. Using 'declare-function' in a file that is
required didn't
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:37:46 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> If I apply this patch as is, then when compiling the notmuch-show.el I
> get the following warnings:
>
> In notmuch-show:
> notmuch-show.el:969:34:Warning: reference to free variable `notmuch-command'
>
> In end of data:
>
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 07:34:57 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> As part of having more information about MIME structure in the JSON
> output (multipart/alternative, for example), I think that we (I, if I
> get to it first) will need to re-work the `show' implementation
> somewhat. We should wait
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 07:32:44 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> * commit a9590dfb4efc2c05a35948ef4522c362eb788c10
> | Author: David Edmondson
> | Date: Thu Apr 1 11:38:30 2010 +0100
> |
> | Makefile: Add the emacs directory to load-path when compiling
That's a nice one-line summary of the
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:53:34 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> Having played with it a tiny bit, I do think that since the part command
> always requires a --part option that we might as well just make it part
> of notmuch show. That is:
>
> notmuch show --part=2 id:foo
>
> instead of:
>
>
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:53:34 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:53:04 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > The updated changes are on the 'dme-for-cworth' branch now.
>
> Thanks for the quick update, David!
>
> I've pushed this now.
Thanks. Here's another set to consider. They are
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:53:34 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:53:04 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
The updated changes are on the 'dme-for-cworth' branch now.
Thanks for the quick update, David!
I've pushed this now.
Thanks. Here's another set
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 07:32:44 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
* commit a9590dfb4efc2c05a35948ef4522c362eb788c10
| Author: David Edmondson d...@dme.org
| Date: Thu Apr 1 11:38:30 2010 +0100
|
| Makefile: Add the emacs directory to load-path when compiling
That's a nice
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 07:34:57 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
As part of having more information about MIME structure in the JSON
output (multipart/alternative, for example), I think that we (I, if I
get to it first) will need to re-work the `show' implementation
somewhat. We should
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:09:57 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:41:03 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > Carl, a couple of patches that I'd like you to consider. They are the
> > first two on the `dme' branch of git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git.
The updated changes are on the
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:09:57 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:41:03 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Carl, a couple of patches that I'd like you to consider. They are the
first two on the `dme' branch of git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git.
The updated
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:53:04 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
The updated changes are on the 'dme-for-cworth' branch now.
Thanks for the quick update, David!
I've pushed this now.
Having played with it a tiny bit, I do think that since the part command
always requires a --part option
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:09:57 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> More significantly, this level of documentation needs to be put into the
> "notmuch help" output (instead of the placeholder that's there in the
> current patch). It also needs to be added to the man page in notmuch.1.
Allow me to
Carl, a couple of patches that I'd like you to consider. They are the
first two on the `dme' branch of git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git.
http://github.com/dme/notmuch/commit/f86254e4509ed02731aa3eaa8541df1f2d11e400
> notmuch-show: Add unix and pretty dates to the JSON output
>
> Include a
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:41:03 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Carl, a couple of patches that I'd like you to consider. They are the
> first two on the `dme' branch of git://github.com/dme/notmuch.git.
Thanks, David!
I've got your branch fetched here and I plan to start playing with
it. The
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:09:57 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
More significantly, this level of documentation needs to be put into the
notmuch help output (instead of the placeholder that's there in the
current patch). It also needs to be added to the man page in notmuch.1.
Allow me
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:54:22 -0500, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> as you already know, I've spent some time working on a vim-based
> interface to notmuch. I currently only depend on the 'march:[01]'
> patches that we talked about briefly on irc. Everything else is
> isolated to the 'vim' directory
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:54:22 -0500, Bart Trojanowski b...@jukie.net wrote:
as you already know, I've spent some time working on a vim-based
interface to notmuch. I currently only depend on the 'march:[01]'
patches that we talked about briefly on irc. Everything else is
isolated to the 'vim'
Carl,
as you already know, I've spent some time working on a vim-based
interface to notmuch. I currently only depend on the 'march:[01]'
patches that we talked about briefly on irc. Everything else is
isolated to the 'vim' directory and should not effect anyone else.
My efforts are cataloged
56 matches
Mail list logo
