Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/therm: ack any pending IRQ at init v2

2013-09-08 Thread Martin Peres
On 04/09/2013 03:52, Ben Skeggs wrote: On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Martin Peres martin.pe...@free.fr wrote: From: Martin Peres martin.pe...@labri.fr This is safe because ptherm hasn't been configured yet and will be a little further down the initialization path. Ptherm should be safe

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/therm: ack any pending IRQ at init v2

2013-09-03 Thread Ben Skeggs
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Martin Peres martin.pe...@free.fr wrote: From: Martin Peres martin.pe...@labri.fr This is safe because ptherm hasn't been configured yet and will be a little further down the initialization path. Ptherm should be safe regarding to runtime reconfiguration. Any

[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/therm: ack any pending IRQ at init v2

2013-08-30 Thread Martin Peres
From: Martin Peres martin.pe...@labri.fr This is safe because ptherm hasn't been configured yet and will be a little further down the initialization path. Ptherm should be safe regarding to runtime reconfiguration. v2: - do not limit this patch to nv84-a3 and make it nv84+ Signed-off-by: Martin