http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
--- Comment #17 from bmaass bma...@math.uni-bremen.de 2009-02-13 02:32:16
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22894)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22894)
randr12 and patches register dump
Patch 0001 didn't do anything
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
--- Comment #18 from Stuart Bennett sb...@cam.ac.uk 2009-02-13 03:12:12 PST
---
(In reply to comment #17)
Created an attachment (id=22894)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22894) [details]
randr12 and patches register
These patches are workarounds, and therefore will not be applied to git.
I made them out of curiosity.
Maarten.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Hervé Cauwelier
herve.cauwel...@free.fr wrote:
Maarten Maathuis a écrit :
[snip]
I can't tell you about the technical quality of this patch but
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
--- Comment #19 from bmaass bma...@math.uni-bremen.de 2009-02-13 05:21:59
PST ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
This register dump is with all three patches, or just the first two?
All three. Do you want one with
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
--- Comment #20 from bmaass bma...@math.uni-bremen.de 2009-02-13 07:51:05
PST ---
BIG CORRECTION!!!
As the picture error didn't get corrected when killing the server, I didn't
notice that patches 1+2+3 actually give a GOOD PICTURE, until I
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
--- Comment #21 from Stuart Bennett sb...@cam.ac.uk 2009-02-13 10:04:50 PST
---
(In reply to comment #20)
BIG CORRECTION!!!
As the picture error didn't get corrected when killing the server, I didn't
notice that patches 1+2+3 actually
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
--- Comment #22 from bmaass bma...@math.uni-bremen.de 2009-02-13 10:14:59
PST ---
(In reply to comment #21)
No, that's fine, I've a better idea of the problem now. I'll try to come up
with some more things next week.
That's fine, the
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20006
--- Comment #23 from Maarten Maathuis madman2...@gmail.com 2009-02-13
10:23:27 PST ---
The patched version is just a hack, try hotplugging a (2nd) dvi monitor and see
the failure ;-)
--
Configure bugmail:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:36:06 +0300
Alexey Kardashevsky aik.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I am newbie in this topic and I have problems trying to bring x.org up
on the hardware I have:
IBM QS22 BladeServer (PowerPC64 architecture) with PCI-Express connected
nVidia 6200 video card.
Since this is a
Thanks for the prompt reply. My comments are below.
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
0005:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV44 [GeForce
6200 LE] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Hmm, note the bus id.
I actually did, but I have no idea how to interpret this. x86
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:49:59 +0300
aik aik.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
0005:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV44 [GeForce
6200 LE] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Hmm, note the bus id.
I actually did, but I have no idea how to interpret
RAOF as noted on IRC earlier today ppa is currently failing to
configure xf86-video-nouveau;
`checking for LIBDRM_NOUVEAU... configure: error: Package requirements
(libdrm_nouveau) were not met: No package 'libdrm_nouveau' found`
Effects both 8.04 and 8.10.
First observed because updated drm
2009/2/13 Alexey Kardashevsky aik.r...@gmail.com:
I am newbie in this topic and I have problems trying to bring x.org up on
the hardware I have:
IBM QS22 BladeServer (PowerPC64 architecture) with PCI-Express connected
nVidia 6200 video card.
OS: Fedora 10-ppc: Linux localhost.localdomain
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16176
--- Comment #24 from Adam Petaccia a...@tpetaccia.com 2009-02-13 16:01:30
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22918)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=22918)
Working Xorg log
Starts up perfectly now. Switching to VT and back
14 matches
Mail list logo
