Changes in v2:
- Compute size based on ramin_rsvd_size
This patch enlarges the PCI GART aperture to 512 MB, or the space
covered by a DMA object filling half RAMIN.
The current 64MB aperture is too small and should be enlarged.
The optimal amound may be card/system-dependent, so a more sophistica
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 18:44 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> 2010/2/8 Marcin Kościelnicki :
> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Kościelnicki
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c |7 +++
> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/
2010/2/8 Marcin Kościelnicki :
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Kościelnicki
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c | 7 +++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
> index fcd7
Added the "Tested-by", added Marcin's real name. And added a spin
unlock in the nv50 fifo failure path.
Will push in a day if there are no further comments.
Maarten.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> - Marcin Slusarz pointed out that this triggers a BUG_ON, because kzall
- Marcin Slusarz pointed out that this triggers a BUG_ON, because kzalloc could
sleep.
- The irq handler should restore the value NV03_PFIFO_CACHES, but still it's
better if this stuff doesn't happen in the middle of fifo create context. I see
no reason in spin locking pgraph create context, it isn
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26102
B Jonnh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anarkog...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from B
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:02:01 +0100
Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> Thanks for pointing that out, is it preferred to use goto style
> failure or just stick the spin unlock everywhere where you return?
In this particular case, just add the unlock where it is needed.
But, keep in mind what might happen, i
Thanks for pointing that out, is it preferred to use goto style
failure or just stick the spin unlock everywhere where you return?
Maarten.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:11:20 +0100
> Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>
>> - 'joi' on irc pointed out that
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:11:20 +0100
Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> - 'joi' on irc pointed out that this triggers a BUG_ON, because
> kzalloc could sleep.
> - The irq handler should restore the value NV03_PFIFO_CACHES, but
> still it's better if this stuff doesn't happen in the middle of
> fifo create c
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:04 +0100, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > IMO, the changes are good. However, DRM_NOUVEAU_HEADER_PATCHLEVEL is
> > used to indicate the version of the kernel interface that's supported,
> > and not the libdrm API version.
>
> OK.
>
> Perhaps it would be useful to add a libdrm A
> IMO, the changes are good. However, DRM_NOUVEAU_HEADER_PATCHLEVEL is
> used to indicate the version of the kernel interface that's supported,
> and not the libdrm API version.
OK.
Perhaps it would be useful to add a libdrm API version number as well?
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
