Re: Move fixed issues to a "< 1.3-incubating" release...

2011-03-13 Thread Lars Corneliussen
it was an error that got irrelevant with the removal of uac in 1.3-incubating. so, somehow it was resolved in context of 1.3. but this is not enough for listing it in the release notes maybe. as we have 'Backlog', we could add an 'Archive'. -- Message sent from mobile device Am 14.03.2011 um

Re: NPanday documentation on Confluence?

2011-03-13 Thread Brett Porter
On 12/03/2011, at 2:33 AM, Lars Corneliussen wrote: > Hi, > > looks good. Wysiwyg is what I want :-) Could we try it? Capacity to set it up? Sounds like a good idea. Do you want to initiate it? > > Funny architecture though. But why not using svn as a backend for CMS. > > _ > Lars > > > Am

Re: Move fixed issues to a "< 1.3-incubating" release...

2011-03-13 Thread Brett Porter
+1 (or maybe "Codeplex") This raises an interesting question going forward though: I noticed you resolved one as "not a problem", as of "1.3-incubating". Was this for the same reason? The problem there is that it results in altering historical release notes, and making a subset of issues appea

Re: NPanday release without the Incubator PMC approval

2011-03-13 Thread Adelita Padilla
Hi Niall, I already removed the binaries and sources from the distribution in www.apache.org. I'll be sending out an email to general-incubator list for the Vote. Thanks, -- liit - "Niall Pemberton" wrote: > This needs to be sorted out. > > Niall > > > -- Forwarded mes

RE: NPanday release without the Incubator PMC approval

2011-03-13 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> This needs to be sorted out. Yes, it does. But it appears that Wendy is on top of it now. --- Noel