Re: [Nrtb-core] [Merge] lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common into lp:nrtb

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
Aron (and the rest of the team), while you are certainly welcome to look at any code set at any time, we need to get this code into the main tree to enable further work on the simulation engine and the data broker. At this point, this is a blocker for work on those components. It's been up for r

[Nrtb-core] [Branch ~fpstovall/nrtb/simengine-alpha-old]

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
Name: simengine-alpha => simengine-alpha-old Status: Experimental => Abandoned -- lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/simengine-alpha-old https://code.launchpad.net/~fpstovall/nrtb/simengine-alpha-old Your team NRTB Core is subscribed to branch lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/simengine-alpha-old. To unsubscribe from

Re: [Nrtb-core] [Question #148070]: How do we define C++ exceptions?

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
Question #148070 on New Real Time Battle changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/nrtb/+question/148070 Rick Stovall posted a new comment: I'm not using any POCO exceptions at the moment, instead favoring my old nrtb::base_exception class for the alpha phase. We can revisit this question later as we

Re: [Nrtb-core] [Question #147131]: Is MUSCLE appropriate to use as our communications engine?

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
Question #147131 on New Real Time Battle changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/nrtb/+question/147131 Status: Answered => Solved Rick Stovall confirmed that the question is solved: We are using custom written communications classes, moving GPB (Google Protocol Buffer) messages over TCP/IP. Th

Re: [Nrtb-core] [Question #138347]: Do we use Boost or POCO?

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
Question #138347 on New Real Time Battle changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/nrtb/+question/138347 Rick Stovall posted a new comment: After some poking around, we've gone back to boost for almost everything except logging. That said, we are still using Rick's custom classes for socket communica

Re: [Nrtb-core] [Merge] lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common into lp:nrtb

2011-09-05 Thread George Jordan
Review: Approve functional review for merge Checked out functional build of cpp_common changes and fixes. Passed functional build test and appears by default to be ready to merge. Will continue to validate however merge may proceed, no apparent discreapancies or problem that would prevent this

Re: [Nrtb-core] [Merge] lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common into lp:nrtb

2011-09-05 Thread DougPiranha
Rick and George say everything is okay, so WTF. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common/+merge/72827 Your team NRTB Core is subscribed to branch lp:nrtb. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~n

Re: [Nrtb-core] [Merge] lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common into lp:nrtb

2011-09-05 Thread DougPiranha
Review: Approve process control Rick spanked my hand. (I liked it.) He said I did not do it right. Is this better? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common/+merge/72827 Your team NRTB Core is subscribed to branch lp:nrtb. ___ Mailing

[Nrtb-core] [Merge] lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common into lp:nrtb

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
The proposal to merge lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common into lp:nrtb has been updated. Status: Needs review => Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common/+merge/72827 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common/+merge/72827 Your team NRTB

[Nrtb-core] [Branch ~nrtb-core/nrtb/alpha] Rev 5: Merged in changes from the cpp_common development branch. The C++ common libs should now be of go...

2011-09-05 Thread noreply
Merge authors: Rick Stovall (fpstovall) Related merge proposals: https://code.launchpad.net/~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common/+merge/72827 proposed by: Rick Stovall (fpstovall) review: Approve - DougPiranha (dougpirahna) review: Approve - George Jordan (gsjordanc) review: Approve - Rick Stoval

[Nrtb-core] [Merge] lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common into lp:nrtb

2011-09-05 Thread noreply
The proposal to merge lp:~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common into lp:nrtb has been updated. Status: Approved => Merged For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common/+merge/72827 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~fpstovall/nrtb/cpp_common/+merge/72827 Your team NRTB Core i

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 815525] Re: Todo: Implement the transceiver class.

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815525 Title: Todo: Implement the transceiver class. Status in The New Rea

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 825614] Re: TODO: Port ricklibIII threads and sockets classes to NRTB

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825614 Title: TODO: Port ricklibIII threads and sockets classes to NRTB St

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 814392] Re: Todo: C++ GPB build process

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814392 Title: Todo: C++ GPB build process Status in The New Real Time Batt

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 723272] Re: Todo: Review the NRTB C++ common classes

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723272 Title: Todo: Review the NRTB C++ common classes Status in The New Rea

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 723503] Re: Todo: triad template lacks an automatic unit test.

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723503 Title: Todo: triad template lacks an automatic unit test. Status in

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 815503] Re: Todo: C++ unit tests for GPB classes

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815503 Title: Todo: C++ unit tests for GPB classes Status in The New Real

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 723277] Re: Todo: Create an archive for common lib

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723277 Title: Todo: Create an archive for common lib Status in The New Re

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 813860] Re: Todo: common_rl needs a unit test created.

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/813860 Title: Todo: common_rl needs a unit test created. Status in The New

[Nrtb-core] [Bug 814217] Re: Todo: Add dot_product and vector_product methods to triad.h

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
** Changed in: nrtb Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is subscribed to New Real Time Battle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814217 Title: Todo: Add dot_product and vector_product methods to triad.h

[Nrtb-core] [Branch ~nrtb-core/nrtb/alpha]

2011-09-05 Thread Rick Stovall
Status: Experimental => Development -- lp:nrtb https://code.launchpad.net/~nrtb-core/nrtb/alpha Your team NRTB Core is subscribed to branch lp:nrtb. To unsubscribe from this branch go to https://code.launchpad.net/~nrtb-core/nrtb/alpha/+edit-subscription