Re: [ns] TCP/FullTcp/Newreno Vs. TCP/Newreno

2006-06-16 Thread Siddharth Ramesh
difference about it in one of them (look for DCCP). Regards, Renata On 6/16/06, Siddharth Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I was using FullTcp/Newreno agent and found that it behaved differently from the normal TCP/Newreno in terms of congestion control. I am really not sure

[ns] TCP/FullTcp/Newreno Vs. TCP/Newreno

2006-06-15 Thread Siddharth Ramesh
Hi all, I was using FullTcp/Newreno agent and found that it behaved differently from the normal TCP/Newreno in terms of congestion control. I am really not sure about what is causing the difference. This difference is especially obvious when the number of flows sharing a bottleneck link becomes

[ns] Problem with Agent/TCP/FullTcp state variable

2006-05-07 Thread Siddharth Ramesh
Hi, I was trying to assign and use state variables inside a FullTcp agent like is done using normal TCP agents. For ex, I create and use a session_number state variable below: set tcpagent [new Agent/TCP/FullTcp] $tcpagent set session_number 0 When I overload the done{} method for the FullTcp