[NSP] Re: [nsp] file

2009-11-01 Thread Julia Say
On 1 Nov 2009, what.me wrote: 

I sent it with a jpeg of the Barrington.

This is the abc, taken from my copy of a copy of the Jock Davidson MS.
I've written the B part out in full since it doesn't quite repeat and one bar 
has 
been appended in a manner I can't reproduce.

X:1
T:The Barrington Hornpipe
C:T. Todd
S: Jock Davidson MS
M:C|
L:1/8
K:G
Bc|dbgd Bgec|AdBG EcAF|DEFG ABcd|edce d2Bc|\
dbgd Bgec|AdBG EcAF|DEFG AcBA|G2 g2 g2:|*
Bc|dcdB GBdg|edec ABce|dcdB GBdB |(3ABA (3GFE D2 Bc|\
dcdB GBdg|edec ABce|dBfe dcBA|G2 g2 g2 Bc|\
dcdB GBdg|edec ABce|dbca BgAG|(3ABA (3GFE D2 Bc|\
dcdB GBdg|edec ABce|dBfe dcBA|G2 g2 g2||**

I don't know about other researchers, but when I've compared other tunes with 
versions in this source they've often turned to be .idiosyncratic, perhaps 
would be the best word.
I would treat it as an example of aural tradition, showing what can happen as 
tunes 
spread out. There are several HIll tunes of this nature in it, amongst other 
stuff.

Anyone wanting a simple abc conversion program might like to consider 
abcexplorer - 
can't remember the URL, but Google would find it. It's free and does a 
reasonable 
job. It's player has drone settings although they're a trifle tricky to find.

Hope this helps
Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Barrington

2009-11-01 Thread what.me
   I've put it on my webpage

   [1]http://members.lycos.co.uk/adrianschofield/



   Under Adrian's playing technique..



   Barrington Hornpipe

   Adrian

   --

References

   1. http://members.lycos.co.uk/adrianschofield/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: [nsp] file

2009-11-01 Thread Steve Bliven
On 11/1/09 9:17 AM, Julia Say julia@nspipes.co.uk wrote:

 Anyone wanting a simple abc conversion program might like to consider
 abcexplorer - 
 can't remember the URL, but Google would find it. It's free and does a
 reasonable 
 job. It's player has drone settings although they're a trifle tricky to find.

For single tunes (and a really bad midi reproduction) the abc converter at
the concertina net is handy.  www.concertina.net/tunes_convert.html

Best wishes.

Steve




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: [nsp] file

2009-11-01 Thread Matt Seattle
   I agree with Julia on the idiosyncratic nature of the Kielder Jock ms.
   Note that the title and composer have been supplied by another hand.
   The version of Barrington is one musician's rendering, and valuable as
   such, but I don't think it improves on the 'original', which is what
   the Fenwick Tutor version appears to be. The other tunes Fenwick
   included show him - imho - to be in touch with the core repertoire of
   the smallpiping tradition, presumably from the best players of the
   time, e.g. his Holey Ha'penny is the Clough version, simplified but
   with all the essentials. --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: [nsp] file (Fenwick)

2009-11-01 Thread Barry Say
Hi All,

Some time ago I psode the question, If I were a 19th Century piping teacher and 
the only book of music I had available was Peacock's tunes, could I grade the 
tunes so that the pupil could start with the easiest and progress through more 
difficult tunes until the whole book was within their reach.  I graded the 50  
tunes 1 (easy) to 5 (difficult) and was pleasantly surprised at the result 
which showed a fairly even spread with category 3 containig the most tunes. 
That sounds like a well-balanced selection to me.

I don't know whether anyone else would like to try  the exercise. It would be 
interesting to compare results. 

Barry


On 1 Nov 2009 at 17:03, Francis Wood wrote:


 They are mostly pretty difficult. I wonder why he failed to  
 additionally provide an additional body of more achievable tunes (if  
 Coquetdale and the basic 'Bonny Pit Laddie' can be so termed).
 In an 'Instruction Book' which is elsewhere generous in space for less  
 useful matter, it seems an odd omission.
 
 Francis
 




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: [nsp] file

2009-11-01 Thread Anthony Robb


   Matt, I think we have to be very careful when making assumptions from
   sparse written sources. What you say might be true we have no way of
   being certain but the evidence I've come across seems to suggest that
   Fenwick's selection was not necessarily the best examples of piping at
   the time but only the best he had experienced and, as we are talking
   about times when people mostly travelled on foot (or pony  trap if
   better off), from a fairly limited geographical area. In Fenwick's time
   there was a railway linking Newcastle and Alnwick but the outlying
   districts of north Northumberland were not easy to reach even 50 years
   after the period we are talking about. We know from Will Atkinson that
   there were musicians liberally scattered throughout those areas in the
   early 20^th century. Presumably these people learnt their craft from
   someone and as dot reading was an extremely rare skill at the time
   there'd be little written evidence of this activity. What we do know is
   that James Hall was appointed to his post as Duke's Piper in 1892 after
   an open competition. As previous appointees came from as far afield as
   Morpeth and North Shields (James Reid was appointed in 1857 and second
   Duke's piper to increase awareness of the instrument) I think we can
   assume competition would be fierce. The stipend of A-L-30 per annum
   would have been worth winning.

   It seems fairly certain, therefore, that James Hall could play well and
   yet there is no mention of him (or anyone else from north
   Northumberland) in the entrants list for the open competitions of the
   Northumbrian Small Pipes Society held in Alnwick in 1895. I have seen
   an original programme for these competitions; Jimmy Little's
   grandfather passed it down to him. His grandfather was the proud
   possessor of a Reid set and taught Hannah Hutton's brother, John
   Robson, the pipes. The programme is a gem of a document but misleading,
   I feel, in this respect, it seems to indicate there were no pipers of
   accomplishment in the Alnwick area at that time.

   I quizzed Jimmy about this and he explained that preliminary auditions
   to gain entry to the competitions were held in Newcastle; far too
   far for working men miles from Alnwick, to get to. For most of them a
   visit to Alnwick was a rarity in 1895!

   What we glean from Kennedy North and Jimmy Little is a tantalising
   glimpse of the strength and history of piping in north Northumberland.
   We know this music tradition is continuous and spans many generations.
   Can we be quite sure that Fenwick had the whole story?

   I hope to do an article on Jimmy Little's experience of the piping
   tradition from up north but I fear much of the general picture has been
   lost. What we can't do is dismiss it as second rate or suggest (as one
   article I read not to long go did) it was non-existent.

   As aye

   Anthony


   --- On Sun, 1/11/09, Matt Seattle theborderpi...@googlemail.com
   wrote:

 From: Matt Seattle theborderpi...@googlemail.com
 Subject: [NSP] Re: [nsp] file
 To: julia@nspipes.co.uk
 Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Sunday, 1 November, 2009, 3:14 PM

  I agree with Julia on the idiosyncratic nature of the Kielder Jock
   ms.
  Note that the title and composer have been supplied by another hand.
  The version of Barrington is one musician's rendering, and valuable
   as
  such, but I don't think it improves on the 'original', which is what
  the Fenwick Tutor version appears to be. The other tunes Fenwick
  included show him - imho - to be in touch with the core repertoire
   of
  the smallpiping tradition, presumably from the best players of the
  time, e.g. his Holey Ha'penny is the Clough version, simplified but
  with all the essentials. --
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[NSP] Re: [nsp] file (Fenwick)

2009-11-01 Thread Julia Say
On 1 Nov 2009, Francis Wood wrote: 

  They are mostly pretty difficult. I wonder why he failed to  
 additionally provide an additional body of more achievable tunes (if  
 Coquetdale and the basic 'Bonny Pit Laddie' can be so termed).
 In an 'Instruction Book' which is elsewhere generous in space for less  
 useful matter, it seems an odd omission.

Perhaps an idea of the tunes learnt by beginners of the time can be garnered by 
inspecting the tune submissions to learner class competitions.
Or indeed the unplaced players in the Open class.

So for example in 1894 Wm Hills played Old Towler and Fenwick's Gathering Tune 
(presumably Sir John of that ilk), R. Batey played My lodging is on the cold 
ground 
(aka Believe me) and WG Brown of Prudhoe (who he?) played Haughs of Cromdale 
and 
Because he was.

In 1896 the 3 beginners listed played Lads of Alnwick, Lamshaw's Fancy and 
Drops of 
Brandy. Although I have been told that this was a shortlist - only the top 3 
beginners got to play on the day.

All found in the Transactions.

Apart from Haughs of Cromdale most of those tunes are familiar to pipers of 
today, 
and a number will at least know of the latter.

There is also the book compiled by young Tom Clough when he was learning 
which 
must have been in the 1920s. I can't lay my hand on the list right now, but I 
know 
it included the Redesdale. If I find it, I'll post it.

Julia






To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: [BULK] Re: [nsp] file

2009-11-01 Thread Paul Gretton
Anthony Robb wrote:

dot reading was an extremely rare skill at the time

If you mean specifically among players of the NSP (or the fiddle, then
perhaps - I wouldn't know.

But if you mean in general, then that is a far too sweeping statement.
Musical literacy was my no means uncommon, even among the working class. You
are ignoring the influence of the Sunday school system, particularly among
Nonconformists, and the self-improvement movement among the so-called
better working class, with the miners being among the leaders. Large
numbers of ordinary people could read music - witness the great Handel
festivals and organisations like the Huddersfield Choral Society.

Cheers,

Paul Gretton 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: [BULK] Re: [nsp] file

2009-11-01 Thread Paul Gretton

It just occurred to me that I ought to have added:

To get an idea of the culture that fostered musical literacy even among very
ordinary people, just read D.H. Lawrence, specifically Sons and Lovers.

Cheers,

Paul Gretton

-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
Of Paul Gretton
Sent: 01 November 2009 19:20
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Re: [BULK] Re: [nsp] file

Anthony Robb wrote:

dot reading was an extremely rare skill at the time

If you mean specifically among players of the NSP (or the fiddle, then
perhaps - I wouldn't know.

But if you mean in general, then that is a far too sweeping statement.
Musical literacy was my no means uncommon, even among the working class. You
are ignoring the influence of the Sunday school system, particularly among
Nonconformists, and the self-improvement movement among the so-called
better working class, with the miners being among the leaders. Large
numbers of ordinary people could read music - witness the great Handel
festivals and organisations like the Huddersfield Choral Society.

Cheers,

Paul Gretton 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html