Dear All,
Here's a collage of the Reavely and Crawhall versions of 'Where have you
been?',
which we were discussing, with 5 strains -
using Reavely's first 3 strains
and continuing using patterns from Crawhall's 4th and 5th,
which were inconsistent with Reavely as they stand.
A more
Erratum:
line 4 in the tune I just sent should end
dgf d2
not dGb c2 - sorry!
So try again -
X:1
T:Where hast thou been all the night?
M:6/8
R: Air
K:G
e|d/c/B/A/B/G/ Bcd|dgB c2e|d/c/B/A/B/G/ Bcd|dgf d2:|
e|dgf dgB|dgB c2e|dgf dgB|dgf d2
e|dgf dgB|dgB c2e|d/c/B/A/B/G/ Bcd|dgf d2||
e|dB/c/d/B/
On 4 Nov 2010, Gibbons, John wrote:
Erratum:
line 4 in the tune I just sent should end dgf d2
and I think in bar 2 of the last line, currently:
e|dcB dcB|dGB c2e|d/c/B/A/B/G/ Bcd|dgf d2||
should possibly be:
dgB c2e|
To me it looks as if strains 3 4 could be reversed (look at bar 4 in
Some time ago I had a go at this too, before I saw the Crawhall set.
I'll look it up.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Julia Say [1]julia@nspipes.co.uk
wrote:
On 4 Nov 2010, Gibbons, John wrote:
Erratum:
line 4 in the tune I just sent should end dgf d2
and I
Before you read on - is anyone besides John Gibbons, Julia Say and
myself interested in this? Seriously, please say so, I'd like to know,
because if not, we can carry on the discussion privately.
If anyone thinks the three of us are crazy, I would like to point out
that I have been
I second that!
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Dave S david...@pt.lu
To: Dartmouth nsp list N.P.S. site nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 1:34 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: Where hast though been all the night?
Original Message
Subject: Re:
Matt,
I don't know, but they should be, as it's a grand tune, of noble ancestry...
Reavely's set is fine but a bit short for addicts of long variation sets.
This may account for the lack of attention so far.
Alan Douglass and I tried playing it dotless in the Calthorpe session last
night,
so
Me too!
And while between the day job taking up silly hours, and workmen
knocking the house about, I haven't had time to more than gloss any of
this last part, yes please - go on.
I look forward to getting time, and a lack of thunderous hammering, to
play this material this w/e - on pipes I
Give it a go on the gurdy too -
It will be interesting to know if this could have been the tune you asked about.
Does it lie as well under the fingers on a hurdy-gurdy as on NSP?
John
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
I will, and will let you know.
Not tonight though, sorry - 4.45 a.m. up this morning to drive to work
and a long day ... I'm off to bed next!
Richard.
On 04/11/2010 19:58, Gibbons, John wrote:
Give it a go on the gurdy too -
It will be interesting to know if this could have been the tune
On 4 Nov 2010, Matt Seattle wrote:
If anyone thinks the three of us are crazy, I would like to point out
that I have been crazy for longer than them.
1994, I think in my case, but I came to that point with a pre-disposition, I
suspect.
I note that it received zero attention
With me, the addiction only in the severe writing form since I got some
NSP in 97 -
but I'd been a Peacock addict since Cut and Dry Dolly came out in the
70's,
and I bought the facsimile edition which I treasure to this day.
Writing set in once I realised Peacock, Bewick and
My vote is that such conversations continue in front of the whole
group. If anyone is uninterested, it takes only a moment to click
next. And there are a lot of lurkers out here who are silent but
interested, and are grateful for being allowed to eavesdrop on informed
discussions.
Totally agree. Information is great to have even if we don't act on it
(yet). Please continue.
Colin Hill
- Original Message -
From: cal...@aol.com
To: theborderpi...@googlemail.com; nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:43 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: Where hast though
14 matches
Mail list logo
