[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread Dave Shaw
Francis Wood said; I must say, I greatly prefer Gilbert Askew's re-working of this tune to the reworking of the abc below! Well you would, it has the familiarity of long association. What Dunk submitted in manuscript to the NPS was no scribble. Its appearance looks plausible and musically

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread Gibbons, John
-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] on behalf of Francis Wood [oatenp...@googlemail.com] Sent: 17 July 2011 00:23 To: barr...@nspipes.co.uk Cc: Dave Shaw; NSPlist Subject: [NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances On 17 Jul 2011, at 00:16, barr...@nspipes.co.uk wrote: I think

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread Francis Wood
I do very much agree with what John Gibbons said a few days ago: If the NPS offered a trophy of a silver cup full of beer for anyone playing W on the W verbatim from memory, nobody would ever want to win it. It doesn't work, whether in classical, modern or traditional terms. Is it really

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread Francis Wood
On 17 Jul 2011, at 14:10, Francis Wood quoted John Gibbons: If the NPS offered a trophy of a silver cup full of beer for anyone playing W on the W verbatim from memory . . . ., Just as an afterthought, John, . . . were you suggesting that the cup full of beer be awarded before, or after

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread Gibbons, John
Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances On 17 Jul 2011, at 14:10, Francis Wood quoted John Gibbons: If the NPS offered a trophy of a silver cup full of beer for anyone playing W on the W verbatim from memory . . . ., Just as an afterthought, John, . . . were you suggesting that the cup full

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread Julia Say
On 17 Jul 2011, Dave Shaw wrote: I haven't seen the original ms I have posted a reduced size version of the scan of the MS on the NPS bulletin board in a new thread entitled Whinshields on the Wall. I hope this helps Julia To get on or off this list see list information at

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread Francis Wood
On 17 Jul 2011, at 13:47, Dave Shaw wrote: The question must therefore be why did Askew choose to re-write the tune or could he not see what should have been staring him in the face either. Perhaps there are two distinct questions here. So here's an attempt at two answers: - The

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread GibbonsSoinne
In a message dated 17/07/2011 17:07:14 GMT Daylight Time, oatenp...@googlemail.com writes: http://www.northumbrianpipers.org.uk/pipersforum/viewtopic.php?f=18; t=206 Dave is right, Dunk meant it to be in ternary form. A, B, A', with A' being an ornamented recap leading

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread Dave Shaw
Thanks for that Julia. It helps to see the full ms and makes perfect sense. The music is at least arranged spacially the way I have suggested and the double length symbol in the last bar shows it to be a slowed finish, again as suggested. Writing music longhand is a slow and precise process.

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread barry07
Quoting Dave Shaw d...@daveshaw.co.uk: It is a little clunky and overcomplicated in places Dave's opinion here echoes my own untutored an instinctive reaction to the ms. A related topic, I have a problem with composition competitions where manuscripts are presented to a judge. Written

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-17 Thread GibbonsSoinne
In a message dated 17/07/2011 20:33:27 GMT Daylight Time, barr...@nspipes.co.uk writes: Just because a piece breaks some notional (artificial?) rules, doesn't make it bad music. Oddly, I don't think W on the W does break any rules in this sense. Except for our

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-16 Thread Dave Shaw
Francis Wood wrote; I'm not convinced that this is anything else other than nonsense. It starts familiarly but then goes completely mad ( a brief allusion to 'Il est né, le Divin Enfant' creeps in) and goes all over the place. I agree, though . . . a very interesting character! Mr Dunk was

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-16 Thread Francis Wood
Hello Dave and others, I must say, I greatly prefer Gilbert Askew's re-working of this tune to the reworking of the abc below! What Dunk submitted in manuscript to the NPS was no scribble. Its appearance looks plausible and musically literate and there's no doubt at all as to the intentions

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-16 Thread barry07
I would like to thank Dave for the effort he has put into this. I do not believe the piece is without merit, but it is beyond my personal musical capacity. Quoting Dave Shaw d...@daveshaw.co.uk: Well, the educated musicians of Dunks day tended to be snobbish and condescending towards

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-15 Thread Francis Wood
Well, this is what Dunk actually wrote, transcribed in abc from the very clear manuscript in the possession of the NPS: X:NPS Collection T:Whin Shields on the Wall C:John L. Dunk Q:1/4=100 M:2/4 L:1/16 K:G z6 d2 |B2G2 G2B2 |A2D2 D2D2 |G2G2 GABc |d3B d2g2 |e2c2 c2e2 |d2G2 G2AB |c2E2 E2FG |ABcd

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-15 Thread Francis Wood
On 15 Jul 2011, at 16:59, Gibbons, John wrote: But it's so free-form that it sounds like he was drunk when he wrote it. H . . . Dunk and disorderly. Francis To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[NSP] Re: Mr Dunk - Inspector of Public Nuisances

2011-07-15 Thread Dave S
from the last couple of mail it's a critiques slam dunk Dave H . . . Dunk and disorderly. Francis To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: