[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Ormston, Chris


-Original Message-
From: Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2008 00:37
To: nsp
Subject: [NSP] jhf


   I would like a straight version of Forsters 'Jim Halls Fancy'
Well you'll not find it on Canal Street!

   p.s. can I choyt at the Bellingham Show?
You can - but don't expect a prize!  Tom Clough's Bellingham adjudication 
speech from the 1930s still applies!!

Chris




   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


The information contained in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure
under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Unless the information is legally exempt, the confidentiality of this e-mail
and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the information contained in this e-mail
is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance upon
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any
unauthorised disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is
strictly prohibited.




[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Julia . Say
On 22 Aug 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote: 

  Bellingham Show?
  Tom Clough's Bellingham
 adjudication speech from the 1930s still applies!!

October 1923:
The chief aim of any player is to produce good music. Now this can 
only be attained by the proper use of his musical instrument.
There are two fundamental principles of good piping, namely winding, 
and execution on the chanter. The chanter, unlike any other form of 
pipe is close fingered - it emits no sound when the finger-holes are 
closed, hence its distinctness. In the hands of an expert the music 
can be produced with surprising distinctness. The principles 
mentioned, combined with the proper musical ideas of the performer, 
makes good piping and tasteful music.

Thanks for the warning, Chris!

Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Ormston, Chris
Thanks - I hope my fingering is more accurate than my memory for dates!

Chris
Tough on choyting, tough on the causers of choyting

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2008 10:11
To: nsp
Subject: [NSP] Re: jhf


On 22 Aug 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote: 

  Bellingham Show?
  Tom Clough's Bellingham
 adjudication speech from the 1930s still applies!!

October 1923:
The chief aim of any player is to produce good music. Now this can 
only be attained by the proper use of his musical instrument.
There are two fundamental principles of good piping, namely winding, 
and execution on the chanter. The chanter, unlike any other form of 
pipe is close fingered - it emits no sound when the finger-holes are 
closed, hence its distinctness. In the hands of an expert the music 
can be produced with surprising distinctness. The principles 
mentioned, combined with the proper musical ideas of the performer, 
makes good piping and tasteful music.

Thanks for the warning, Chris!

Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


The information contained in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure
under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Unless the information is legally exempt, the confidentiality of this e-mail
and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the information contained in this e-mail
is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance upon
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any
unauthorised disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is
strictly prohibited.




[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Julia . Say
On 22 Aug 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote: 
,
 I've just had an off-list request for an explanation of choyting. 
 Clough described it as To grace a note in the manner of a Highland
 piper i.e. to play a grace note, then a melody note without silence
 between the two.  

and (in reference to the 1895 Fenwick tutor):
Regarding the shake: In many instances it is understood and played 
by pipers in the following manner: They lift the principal note, and 
successively strike the note above while the principal note is kept 
running. A grievous error in smallpipe playing. 

Clough had been asked for his opinion on an update of the tutor to be 
published in 1931, and I added a note to the above paragraph:
 Clough was adamant that this, a technical description of a trill 
and an inverted mordent, should be omitted - it was not, but a note 
was added to the effect that lifting several fingers at once was not 
good technique.

 For me, the skill of Northumbrian piping is to play without resorting
 to open gracings. 

I interpret that as obeying the one finger off at a time rule at all 
times, (when possible - it isn't if you're going to use finger 
vibrato) but I get my ear bent that I'm ower rigorous in my 
interpretation. 
And doubtless will again after this post!

Adrian gives an excellent description of the top a to g note gracing 
as sounding like a seagull in pain if not executed properly, which is 
one prominent example of open gracing very commonly heard.


HTH
Julia




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Gibbons, John
Adrian gives an excellent description of the top a to g note gracing as
sounding like a seagull in pain if not executed properly, which is one
prominent example of open gracing very commonly heard.

Not executed properly? But isn't it meant to sound like that? 
The cry of the curlew, bleating of sheep etc

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 22 August 2008 11:10
To: nsp; Ormston, Chris
Subject: [NSP] Re: jhf

On 22 Aug 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote: 
,
 I've just had an off-list request for an explanation of choyting. 
 Clough described it as To grace a note in the manner of a Highland 
 piper i.e. to play a grace note, then a melody note without silence 
 between the two.

and (in reference to the 1895 Fenwick tutor):
Regarding the shake: In many instances it is understood and played by
pipers in the following manner: They lift the principal note, and
successively strike the note above while the principal note is kept
running. A grievous error in smallpipe playing. 

Clough had been asked for his opinion on an update of the tutor to be
published in 1931, and I added a note to the above paragraph:
 Clough was adamant that this, a technical description of a trill and
an inverted mordent, should be omitted - it was not, but a note was
added to the effect that lifting several fingers at once was not good
technique.

 For me, the skill of Northumbrian piping is to play without resorting 
 to open gracings.

I interpret that as obeying the one finger off at a time rule at all
times, (when possible - it isn't if you're going to use finger
vibrato) but I get my ear bent that I'm ower rigorous in my
interpretation. 
And doubtless will again after this post!

Adrian gives an excellent description of the top a to g note gracing as
sounding like a seagull in pain if not executed properly, which is one
prominent example of open gracing very commonly heard.


HTH
Julia




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Ormston, Chris
Just this morning I couldn't hear the pit hooter for all those pesky curlews 
and sheep!

Chris


-Original Message-
From: Gibbons, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2008 11:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [NSP] Re: jhf


Adrian gives an excellent description of the top a to g note gracing as
sounding like a seagull in pain if not executed properly, which is one
prominent example of open gracing very commonly heard.

Not executed properly? But isn't it meant to sound like that? 
The cry of the curlew, bleating of sheep etc

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 22 August 2008 11:10
To: nsp; Ormston, Chris
Subject: [NSP] Re: jhf

On 22 Aug 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote: 
,
 I've just had an off-list request for an explanation of choyting. 
 Clough described it as To grace a note in the manner of a Highland 
 piper i.e. to play a grace note, then a melody note without silence 
 between the two.

and (in reference to the 1895 Fenwick tutor):
Regarding the shake: In many instances it is understood and played by
pipers in the following manner: They lift the principal note, and
successively strike the note above while the principal note is kept
running. A grievous error in smallpipe playing. 

Clough had been asked for his opinion on an update of the tutor to be
published in 1931, and I added a note to the above paragraph:
 Clough was adamant that this, a technical description of a trill and
an inverted mordent, should be omitted - it was not, but a note was
added to the effect that lifting several fingers at once was not good
technique.

 For me, the skill of Northumbrian piping is to play without resorting 
 to open gracings.

I interpret that as obeying the one finger off at a time rule at all
times, (when possible - it isn't if you're going to use finger
vibrato) but I get my ear bent that I'm ower rigorous in my
interpretation. 
And doubtless will again after this post!

Adrian gives an excellent description of the top a to g note gracing as
sounding like a seagull in pain if not executed properly, which is one
prominent example of open gracing very commonly heard.


HTH
Julia




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




The information contained in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure
under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Unless the information is legally exempt, the confidentiality of this e-mail
and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the information contained in this e-mail
is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance upon
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any
unauthorised disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is
strictly prohibited.




[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Julia . Say
On 22 Aug 2008, Gibbons, John wrote: 
 
 Not executed properly? But isn't it meant to sound like that? 
 The cry of the curlew, bleating of sheep etc

I withdraw that comment - possibly it's the piper doing it who should 
be executed properly.


v. big grin
Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Ormston, Chris
While we're fortunate to have some written evidence of Clough's thoughts on all 
this, it's important to recognise other examples of clean, closed fingering 
from recent history - it's not just a Clough thing.  Joe Hutton's playing 
clearly demonstrated detached fingering and contained few open gracings, and 
I'd urge readers to listen to his earlier recordings - those made when he was a 
well man and before his focus drifted from Northumbrian to strict tempo 
Scottish Country dance repertoire.  George Atkinson's name appears again and 
again on the competition cups, and his contributions on the Wild Hills of 
Wannies LP shows why - some of the most clear, musical interpretations of 
hornpipes you could wish for!

Chris


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2008 11:10
To: nsp; Ormston, Chris
Subject: [NSP] Re: jhf


On 22 Aug 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote: 
,
 I've just had an off-list request for an explanation of choyting. 
 Clough described it as To grace a note in the manner of a Highland
 piper i.e. to play a grace note, then a melody note without silence
 between the two.  

and (in reference to the 1895 Fenwick tutor):
Regarding the shake: In many instances it is understood and played 
by pipers in the following manner: They lift the principal note, and 
successively strike the note above while the principal note is kept 
running. A grievous error in smallpipe playing. 

Clough had been asked for his opinion on an update of the tutor to be 
published in 1931, and I added a note to the above paragraph:
 Clough was adamant that this, a technical description of a trill 
and an inverted mordent, should be omitted - it was not, but a note 
was added to the effect that lifting several fingers at once was not 
good technique.

 For me, the skill of Northumbrian piping is to play without resorting
 to open gracings. 

I interpret that as obeying the one finger off at a time rule at all 
times, (when possible - it isn't if you're going to use finger 
vibrato) but I get my ear bent that I'm ower rigorous in my 
interpretation. 
And doubtless will again after this post!

Adrian gives an excellent description of the top a to g note gracing 
as sounding like a seagull in pain if not executed properly, which is 
one prominent example of open gracing very commonly heard.


HTH
Julia




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


The information contained in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure
under the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Unless the information is legally exempt, the confidentiality of this e-mail
and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the information contained in this e-mail
is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance upon
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any
unauthorised disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is
strictly prohibited.




[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Julia . Say
On 22 Aug 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote: 

  it's not just a Clough
 thing.  Joe Hutton's playing clearly demonstrated detached fingering
 and contained few open gracings, and I'd urge readers to listen to his
 earlier recordings .  George Atkinson's name appears again and again on the
 competition cups, and his contributions on the Wild Hills of Wannies
 LP shows why - 

Joe was taught by GG Armstrong, and within my time (1992 or 3, I 
would think) remarked in a teaching situation that it was not the 
notes that were important as the spaces in between. I learnt a lot 
from him - possibly not always what he was trying to teach.

Do we know who George A's teachers were - if any?

The influence of GGA, himself taught by Clough, is much underrated, I 
think. I remember meeting the late John Miller (also a GGA pupil) in 
NZ in 2001, hearing him play, and sensing how strongly his style was 
a product of his teaching, even after 40-50 years at the other end of 
the world.
It contrasted so much with what the rest of us were playing, in a 
group...

Ouch
Julia




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: jhf

2008-08-22 Thread Julia . Say
On 22 Aug 2008, Ormston, Chris wrote: 

 I may have imagined this, but I've a feeling GGA was involved in
 George Atkinson's tuition. 

Ah. I thought so, but couldn't place where I'd heard it.

 Thanks for getting me going about piping ensembles too - was it
 intentional???  

No, it just sort of came out. But let's go with it

2) More than 3 sets of NSP in
 ensemble starts to sound like one of those kazoo-based Juvenile Jazz
 bands e had in the 1960s 

How many sets were on Cut  Dry? Compare and contrast the tracks with 
only one or two, versus the ones where more than that were playing, 
maybe

And if you start with a group where most of the sets sound like 
kazoos anyway, whether naturally or thanks to their players, there 
isn't a hope.

3) Plaid is bad

or at least (as far as pipers were concerned) a Victorian invention 
by the 4th Duke, who wanted to keep up with the MacJones's north of 
him in the great tartan craze of the 1820s / 30s.

I don't doubt that some local shepherds did actually use them before 
that - I've been told the weave was different in each valley so that 
when a frozen corpse was found on the hills in the spring the body 
could be identified.

Even then the Duke's piper was / is the only one to whom it was / is 
relevant, and the first one of those to use the whole rig out - 
blackcock feather and all was Jack Armstrong, piper from 1949-78, 
although James Hall came close in the late C19

Traditional? I don't think so.
Expedient on occasion today?  Probably. Enough folk have got them 
that I needn't bother. Phew
Used to cover musical deficiency?  You may so, I couldn't possibly 
comment!

Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html