RE: [NSWolves] Positives [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-03-04 Thread Jeremy Tonks
ubject: RE: [NSWolves] Positives [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED Probabaly the worst Wolves PL perfromance I've seen...absolutely terrible. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 5 Marc

RE: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Paul Taylor
I wish that was my decision. I stuck it out, then didn't fall asleep until after 4. Ugh. Can someone remind me why we do this? > From: matthew.le...@rms.nsw.gov.au > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 07:47:46 +1100 > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Positives >

RE: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Jeremy Tonks
swolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 7:46 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Positives There was one major positive from this mornings game: >From the kick-off we didn't pass it straight back to Hennessey, instead it only went to Ward at

Re: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Steven Millward
e game 'When you lose > a game 5-1 you are not going to turn around and send out the same team and > same subs' - let's see what he does after this result. > > > -- > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *

RE: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Rog & Reet
lf Of mark worrall Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 8:51 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Positives Better to lose 5-0 and force TC to make substantial changes, than 1-0 and have the same back four next week. If he picks Stearman or Berra again next match after that pathetic performanc

RE: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread LEESE Matthew
ent: Monday, 5 March 2012 8:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Positives 12 goals conceded in the last 3 games!! Makes it exceptionally hard to win with a defence like that. Need to bounce back big time against Blackburn. Paul Crowe Sales Manager - Asia Pacific ConTech (Syd

RE: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread mark worrall
s.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 6:46 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Positives There was one major positive from this mornings game: >From the kick-off we didn't pass it straight back to Hennessey, instead it only went to Ward

RE: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Paul Crowe
Fax: 02 97396542 Mob: 0406009562 Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com Website: www.contechengineering.com From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 8:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves

Re: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Steven Millward
It's a fair point but in reality, they are near the bottom too, so can't be much better. On 5 March 2012 08:29, Marcus Chantry wrote: > good pick up Steve. Definitely more positive than a 6-0, 7-0 or even 8-0. > > Bet Blackburn are shitting themselves about playing us in the 6-pointer > next w

Re: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Marcus Chantry
I'd be feeling worse if I was a Spurs fan. They dominated Man Utd, outshot them 18-6 and still lost 3-1. On 05/03/2012, at 8:29 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > good pick up Steve. Definitely more positive than a 6-0, 7-0 or even 8-0. > > Bet Blackburn are shitting themselves about playing us in t

Re: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Marcus Chantry
good pick up Steve. Definitely more positive than a 6-0, 7-0 or even 8-0. Bet Blackburn are shitting themselves about playing us in the 6-pointer next weekend. On 05/03/2012, at 8:16 AM, Steven Millward wrote: > We didn't lose 6-0. > > On 5 March 2012 07:45, Marcus Chantry wrote: > There was

Re: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Steven Millward
We didn't lose 6-0. On 5 March 2012 07:45, Marcus Chantry wrote: > There was one major positive from this mornings game: > > From the kick-off we didn't pass it straight back to Hennessey, instead it > only went to Ward at left back. So quite clearly we are making progress > under Connor. > > T

RE: [NSWolves] Positives [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-03-04 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED Probabaly the worst Wolves PL perfromance I've seen...absolutely terrible. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 06:46 To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Positives Ther

RE: [NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread LEESE Matthew
My decision to go back to bed after the 3rd goal was a very positive move. -Original Message- From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 7:46 AM To: NSWolves Subject: [NSWolves] Positives There was one

[NSWolves] Positives

2012-03-04 Thread Marcus Chantry
There was one major positive from this mornings game: >From the kick-off we didn't pass it straight back to Hennessey, instead it >only went to Ward at left back. So quite clearly we are making progress under >Connor. The rest was pretty ordinary: Shots on target 12 - 1 to Fulham 60% possessio