level as the
fat and sugar in their garbage.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN white elephant
Wondered whether you would take the bait Rog!!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu Jan 27 19:42:36 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don’t they scrap things
: [BTMO] Flood levy
Wondered whether you would take the bait Rog!!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu Jan 27 19:42:36 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they scrap things that really
!
--
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Rog Reet
*Sent:* Thursday, 27 January 2011 10:03 PM
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Took all my will power not to get political and mention
2011 8:35 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy
I think Gillard has made a huge gaffe with this one. The people have
spoken.
Double dissolution and let's get the Libs back in. They know what they're
doing.
On 28 January 2011 08:23, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au
.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 9:00 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy
I guess the lesson is dont waste your money paying for insurance as the
council will pay through
Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 08:09
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
I was half hoping no one would raise this nasty. You're right. And many
of them are uninsured because they live in flood prone areas and are,
therefore, by definition uninsurable. But what
Slap a 99% tax on all property developers.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 9:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified]
As someone said to me yesterday
@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Jeremy Tonks
*Sent:* Friday, 28 January 2011 9:09 AM
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
I was half hoping no one would raise this nasty. You’re right. And many of
them are uninsured because
Quadruple the rich git's rates in the Eastern suburbs.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 5:47 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified]
Excellent idea
January 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy
And so true. They are terrified of not getting back into surplus by
2013 and so won't borrow the money, which is what a government should do
in this situation.
You can also guarantee that if the budget
Because that would be a good idea.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN white
levy
Because that would be a good idea.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they ditch
13 matches
Mail list logo
