On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 18:03:35 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> > I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to
> > \frac...
>
> and because of the many {} you then need you get these mismatch
> errors ... but, you can make
>
>
On 06/07/2017 11:01 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> sure it's no big deal to write such a script but in decades of tex i
> never felt the need
I wrote a small script for my Linux machine (check-context.sh), to be
able to check a single file:
source $HOME/ctxbeta/tex/setuptex
mtxrunjit
On 6/7/2017 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
In 2017.06.06 13:22 something is still not correct.
i mentioned that you need a new engine (the garden has 1.0.5 binafies
for windows but other platforms need to be generated)
Hans
On 6/7/2017 9:02 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:11:14 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
(but i have to admit that i normally just run files and redo after
fixing an error, running is fast enough)
My question here isn’t about speed. If a
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:33:05 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/07/2017 10:16 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez
wrote:
And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically
helps a
On 06/07/2017 10:16 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically
>> helps a lot.
>
> Scite: Ctrl-0
> Notepad++: Ctrl-Shift-0
>
> (new n++ setup
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:08:21 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
And creating a keyboard shortcut to launch the script automatically
helps a lot.
Scite: Ctrl-0
Notepad++: Ctrl-Shift-0
(new n++ setup for context currently under development)
Idris
--
Idris Samawi Hamid, Professor
On 06/07/2017 09:08 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 8:11 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source
>> files and it actually loads five source files, the problem is having to
>> check the files individually.
>
> in that case i always
On 06/07/2017 09:02 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
> [...]
> As a matter of workflow, I would just check each \input when editing it,
> don't see the need to check them all over and over - but maybe you have
> some huge collaborative project with lots of \inputs frequently
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mikael,
>>>
>>> Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac
>>>
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mikael,
>>
>> Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac
>> yields the correct behavior. Please try the following sample:
>>
>> %%% begin
On 06/07/2017 09:02 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 8:23 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> \c!align=\v!none, % New, for Tacos extremely large graphics.
>>
>> Sorry for asking, but would it be possible that the key should set
>> alignment for externalfigures and there is a bug in
On 6/7/2017 8:11 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source
files and it actually loads five source files, the problem is having to
check the files individually.
in that case i always run the individual files independently when
editing
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:11:14 -0600, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
(but i have to admit that i normally just run files and redo after
fixing an error, running is fast enough)
My question here isn’t about speed. If a source may load twenty source
files and it actually loads five source
On 6/7/2017 8:23 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/07/2017 03:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Does anyone know how the align key in \setupexternalfigure works?
it doesn't (no clue what it should be doing anyway)
Many thanks for your reply, Hans.
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 02:09:48 -0600, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/06/2017 10:56 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
[...]
Would it be any way to make ConTeXt report that \linenote{ hasn’t been
closed?
Just check your file
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 4:50 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this might be a matter of taste.
>>>
>>> look at the output of (attached).
On 06/07/2017 03:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Does anyone know how the align key in \setupexternalfigure works?
>
> it doesn't (no clue what it should be doing anyway)
Many thanks for your reply, Hans.
grph-inc.mkiv includes the following
On 06/07/2017 10:09 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> If I runt "mtxrunjit --autogenerate --script check b.tex", I get the
>> following message:
>>
>> no error
>>
>> Is there no way to check also the files loaded by the main source?
>
> i just
On 6/7/2017 4:50 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Hi,
this might be a matter of taste.
look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root
is to "high", while it looks better on the second line.
On 6/7/2017 5:12 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi,
Indeed using \frac yields a weird result in the example sent by Mikael.
Compare the output of the three formulas below, with or without
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=default].
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the
On 6/7/2017 5:45 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
Otared Kavian wrote:
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
one is weird when using \frac and
I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to \frac...
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 17:45, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
> Otared Kavian wrote:
>
>> The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
>> one is weird when using \frac and
>
> I have been massacred on this
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:12:44 +0200
Otared Kavian wrote:
> The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first
> one is weird when using \frac and
I have been massacred on this list for ever preferring \over to \frac...
Hi,
Indeed using \frac yields a weird result in the example sent by Mikael.
Compare the output of the three formulas below, with or without
\setupmathradical[sqrt][alternative=default].
The results are correct using \over in both cases, while the first one is weird
when using \frac and
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this might be a matter of taste.
>
> look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root
> is to "high", while it looks better on the second line. From
> setup-en.pdf it looks like the
On 6/4/2017 11:29 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\setupexternalfigure[location=default, align=middle]
\starttext
\dontleavehmode\externalfigure[cow.pdf]
\externalfigure[cow.pdf]
\stoptext
As you can see, \dontleavehmode makes no
On 6/7/2017 7:02 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 06/06/2017 10:56 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
[...]
Would it be any way to make ConTeXt report that \linenote{ hasn’t been
closed?
Just check your file before running it:
mtxrun --autogenerate --script check test.tex
Running
28 matches
Mail list logo