Dear Hans,
I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula.
It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think.
Thank you for your concern.
One thing that I’d like say is that a new line in the splitted long formula
usually starts with operations in many
> On 17 Jun 2017, at 15:16, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> On 17 Jun 2017, at 12:11, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> On 06/17/2017 10:11 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Yes, that is the problem. It works fine with latest beta.
>>>
>>> I found a strange bug with the
> On 17 Jun 2017, at 12:11, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
> On 06/17/2017 10:11 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> [...]
>> Yes, that is the problem. It works fine with latest beta.
>>
>> I found a strange bug with the \tt command: when copying from the
>> PDF, the spaces disappear. With your
> On 17 Jun 2017, at 13:03, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 6/17/2017 10:30 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> It says that XITS is an OpenType version of STIX on [1], but the latter now
>> supports it. Does that mean that one can now use the latter directly?
>> 1.
> On 17 Jun 2017, at 12:11, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
> On 06/17/2017 10:11 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> [...]
>> Yes, that is the problem. It works fine with latest beta.
>>
>> I found a strange bug with the \tt command: when copying from the
>> PDF, the spaces disappear. With your
On 6/17/2017 10:30 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
It says that XITS is an OpenType version of STIX on [1], but the latter now
supports it. Does that mean that one can now use the latter directly?
1. http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math_fonts
i don't know as i never use those fonts in documents; maybe the
On 06/17/2017 10:11 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
> [...]
> Yes, that is the problem. It works fine with latest beta.
>
> I found a strange bug with the \tt command: when copying from the
> PDF, the spaces disappear. With your header above, I get (the
> comments is the text copy from the PDF):
> [...]
>
> On 17 Jun 2017, at 08:33, Henri Menke wrote:
>
> The fallback mechanism has changed in a non-trivial manner since TL2017. You
> have to go with beta.
I looked at various fonts, and they all have at least some math characters that
look strange to me. So I figure one
It says that XITS is an OpenType version of STIX on [1], but the latter now
supports it. Does that mean that one can now use the latter directly?
1. http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math_fonts
___
If your question is
> On 17 Jun 2017, at 08:33, Henri Menke wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 22:07 +0200, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 Jun 2017, at 21:46, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/16/2017 09:34 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
Thank you for the help. But the
> On 17 Jun 2017, at 07:36, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2017 10:07 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> On 16 Jun 2017, at 21:46, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I don’t do math (at all, not only with ConTeXt), but the following
>>> command seems to work:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 22:07 +0200, Hans Åberg wrote:
> >
> > On 16 Jun 2017, at 21:46, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > On 06/16/2017 09:34 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you for the help. But the math characters do not show in \tt,
> > > as in the example below. (Tried
12 matches
Mail list logo