Re: [NTG-context] question about STIX fonts (versions one and two)

On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 07:19 +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > Dear list, > > I have the following sample: > > \setupbodyfont[stixtwo] > \starttext > \input zapf > \stoptext > > Even if \setupbodyfont[stix] is used, I don’t get any text. The fonts > seem to be missing. > > I have

[NTG-context] question about STIX fonts (versions one and two)

Dear list, I have the following sample: \setupbodyfont[stixtwo] \starttext \input zapf \stoptext Even if \setupbodyfont[stix] is used, I don’t get any text. The fonts seem to be missing. I have checked this with a new ConTeXt Suite install and the same results. Are the STIX

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 13:00 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/17/2017 3:48 PM, Jeong Dal wrote: > > > > Dear Hans, > > > > I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula. > > It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think. > > Thank you for your concern.

Re: [NTG-context] typesetting serial letters in Context

Dear Context’ers, I am trying to use the letter module in mkiv for typesetting serial letters from an xml database. Thanks, Thomas for looking into this. I appreciate it very much. Yet I don’t know either whether I actually need the letter module, but it seemed reasonable to try this first.

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

Dear Hans, > 2017. 6. 18. 오후 8:00, Hans Hagen 작성: > > this is how tex works: just look at inline math > Yes, you are right. To start a new line with a sign may be a preference of me and some others. I found a document which illustrates the different displays of a long

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 6/17/2017 3:48 PM, Jeong Dal wrote: Dear Hans, I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula. It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think. Thank you for your concern. One thing that I’d like say is that a new line in the splitted long formula