On 5/28/2021 16:33, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2021 19:52:19 - (UTC)
Nicola wrote:
If there is no publisher, then @unpublished is a better category.
APA explicitly, and for good reason, accounts for self-publishing,
indicating that the Author was the publisher.
Ah ok, that
Pablo, thanks for the assistance you gave me... it made me look at the
cache inside the lmtx folders and I could see that the entire luatex
folder was missing. I did try your --erase and --generate moves, but
that did nothing to resolve things, so I installed the latest 2021.05.27
14:15 and
On Fri, 28 May 2021 19:52:19 - (UTC)
Nicola wrote:
> > If there is no publisher, then @unpublished is a better category.
> > APA explicitly, and for good reason, accounts for self-publishing,
> > indicating that the Author was the publisher.
>
> Ah ok, that explains the output I was
On 2021-05-28, Alan Braslau wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2021 13:02:10 -0400 (EDT)
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> > If you have not defined a publisher, how should ANY format place the
>> > undefined publisher's name?
>>
>> Simply leave it blank?
>
> If there is no publisher, then @unpublished is a
Michael Guravage schrieb am 28.05.2021 um 19:33:
A pox upon me for a clumsy lout!
You can also remove
\usetypescriptfile[...]
from your document because \setupbodyfont loads the file itself when the
typeface and the file have matching names.
Wolfgang
On Fri, 28 May 2021 13:02:10 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > If you have not defined a publisher, how should ANY format place the
> > undefined publisher's name?
>
> Simply leave it blank?
If there is no publisher, then @unpublished is a better category. APA
explicitly, and for good
On 5/28/21 12:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 5/28/2021 11:40 AM, jbf wrote:
>> [...]
>> As this may be an 'ignorant' kind of question, something I should really
>> know but don't, about paths and permissions, there may be someone else
>> on the list with time (in lockdown like I am) to put me
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\setuppapersize[A9]
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\enabledirectives[references.border]
\unexpanded\def\MyURL#1%
{\bgroup\goto{{\tt\hyphenatedurl{#1}}}[url(#1)]\egroup}
\starttext
\startitemize
\dorecurse{2}{\item
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\startitemize
\dorecurse{15}
{\item[\recurselevel]whatever}
\stopitemize
As exposed in \in{item}[9]...
\stoptext
How can I add style to the item reference (9)?
I mean, how can I get “As exposed in item {\em 9}”?
Many thanks
A pox upon me for a clumsy lout!
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 6:54 PM Thomas A. Schmitz <
thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>
> > On 28. May 2021, at 18:40, Michael Guravage <
> gurav...@literatesolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > Any encouragement in how to resolve this would be much appreciated.
> >
>
On Fri, 28 May 2021, Alan Braslau wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 20:21:55 - (UTC)
> Nicola wrote:
>
> > Thank you all for the precious comments.
> >
> > The current LMTX appears to have almost fixed my issue, except that
> > inproceedings entries without a publisher have the text "Author"
>
> On 28. May 2021, at 18:40, Michael Guravage
> wrote:
>
> Any encouragement in how to resolve this would be much appreciated.
>
Hi Michael,
Try renaming it to type-imp-DollyPro.tex (and then of course
\usetypescriptfile[type-imp-DollyPro]), that should help. This changed a couple
of
> On 23 May 2021, at 23:41, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> So this is not lmtx (which also has luatex) but the regular installation
> right?
The error occurs when there is a newline before the \starttext, as in the
attachment. Remove the initial newline, and it compiles with
context line_bug.tex
Yesterday I installed a new LMTX instance *ex nihilo*. Unfortunately, the
new instance will not load my typescripts. My several commercial fonts and
the typescripts I wrote for them reside in the texmf-project tree, along
with a style file that loads them. I load the style file in my source files
On 5/28/2021 6:05 PM, Werner Hennrich wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm looking into my environment's logging to trace a problem and realize
that \writeline is gone mute -
that is, the output of subsequent logging lines now gets joined up in
the same line, very hard to read...
i'll check it
Hello everyone,
I'm looking into my environment's logging to trace a problem and realize
that \writeline is gone mute -
that is, the output of subsequent logging lines now gets joined up in
the same line, very hard to read...
I observe this in version: 2021.05.27 14:15, as well as in version:
On Thu, 27 May 2021 20:21:55 - (UTC)
Nicola wrote:
> Thank you all for the precious comments.
>
> The current LMTX appears to have almost fixed my issue, except that
> inproceedings entries without a publisher have the text "Author"
> instead of the publisher's name.
>
> I must say that I
Am 27.05.21 um 21:24 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
This macro \setupindentations is mentioned in my ConText the manual
from november 12, 2001.
It seems to have disappeared.
Is that so? Then why? What replacement?
How about \setupindenting ?
> On 23 May 2021, at 23:41, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> So this is not lmtx (which also has luatex) but the regular installation
> right?
It works with
mtxrun math_style.tex
but not
context math_style.tex
where the file math_style.tex only contains
\starttext
\m{f = \beta}
\stoptext
It does
>> >> Thanks. I have updated to version 2021.05.23 and run `mtxrun
>> >> --generate`. Syntax highlighting is fine, but with LMTX I'm still
>> >> getting an en-dash. Below, a MWE.
>> >
>> > Can you test if the file tests/vim/21-en-dash.tex works fine at your end:
>> >
>> >
On 5/28/2021 11:40 AM, jbf wrote:
Still finding it very difficult to nail what the real problem is. You
say: "An mtxrun --generate or even context --generate should work ok. if
not there's something with permissions or paths or a missing file".
Neither of the --generate options make any
Still finding it very difficult to nail what the real problem is. You
say: "An mtxrun --generate or even context --generate should work ok. if
not there's something with permissions or paths or a missing file".
Neither of the --generate options make any difference, so it clearly has
to come
On 5/28/2021 7:13 AM, jbf wrote:
Hi list,
Not at all sure why this is happening. In my most recent install of lmtx
(which works fine as lmtx) on Linux, I wanted to choose the --luatex
option just to make a comparison between the mkiv output and lmtx.
The redirection part seems to work (...
On 5/27/2021 10:43 PM, Hans van der Meer wrote:
Why is there not implemented in \subsection a \leavevmode at the end of
it? Here a minimal example showing that starting with the first word in
an \hbox encounters vertical mode. Thus requiring a \leavevmode to put
it on line with the following
On Thu, 27 May 2021, Nicola wrote:
> On 2021-05-27, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 May 2021, Nicola wrote:
> >
> >> On 2021-05-24, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 21 May 2021, Nicola wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I have only a minor annoyance: I have just noticed that -- is typeset as
> >>
25 matches
Mail list logo
