For the MacOS system wide installation [1], the command 'sudo sh
./first-setup.sh' does not have arguments for modules and engine, as for the
local installation. Is that correct? —I could not get the commutative diagrams
tikz module to work.
1. http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Mac_Installation
_
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 20:18, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>>> Hans Åberg 29. September 2016 um 15:04
>>> The example below compiles with latest ConTeXt, suggesting that the Unicode
>>> quadruple symbol ⨌ has not been registered as a math symbol, as the
The example below compiles with latest ConTeXt, suggesting that the Unicode
quadruple symbol ⨌ has not been registered as a math symbol, as the command it
is set to is ignored.
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits, lcgreek=normal, default=normal]
\appendtoks
\catcod
> On 26 Sep 2016, at 11:25, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
> Can you provide your file(s) for download?
I have made a new set, at [1], as before:
Abbreviations using non-alphanumerical symbols now drop the leading "\", as
they seemed to caused strange conflicts. Easier to type, but will have f
> On 26 Sep 2016, at 11:25, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>> Hans Åberg 26. September 2016 um 11:00
>>> FYI, I made interactive text substitutions (on MacOS) for the Unicode math
>>> letters plus a number of symbols. With it in hand, it is not particularly
>>&
FYI, I made interactive text substitutions (on MacOS) for the Unicode math
letters plus a number of symbols. With it in hand, it is not particularly
difficult to use Unicode symbols in the input file.
___
If your qu
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 20:19, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
> Another input method is shown in the following video [1] where each symbol
> get its own command, e.g. \mbfitx is equal to {\bi x}.
This works on MacOS 10.12 in any application that uses the standard text
services. One has an XML .pli
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 20:19, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
> Another input method is shown in the following video [1] where each symbol
> get its own command, e.g. \mbfitx is equal to {\bi x}. The source table
> mentioned in the video can be found on the STIX page [2].
>
> [1] http://zeeba.tv/re
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 20:19, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>>> Hans Åberg 15. September 2016 um 19:44
>>>
>>> I use Xcode on MacOS (former OS X), which has very good Unicode support
>>> (including RTL scripts). There is a Unicode symbols table, b
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 20:19, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>>> Hans Åberg 15. September 2016 um 19:44
>>>
>>> I use Xcode on MacOS (former OS X), which has very good Unicode support
>>> (including RTL scripts). There is a Unicode symbols table, b
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 18:50, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> (the scite setup that ships with context provides alphabet / symbol strips)
I use Xcode on MacOS (former OS X), which has very good Unicode support
(including RTL scripts). There is a Unicode symbols table, but it is slow. One
can also design
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 18:50, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 9/15/2016 6:33 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> If one does not know the Unicode character, because the translation is
>> correct, one can typeset using legacy TeX commands, and copy from the output
>> PDF. It can the
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 17:13, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>>> The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicod
> On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:43, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>> Hans Åberg 14. September 2016 um 15:39
>>
>> OK. Thanks.
>>
>> There is both \setupformulas and \setupfo
> On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:24, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>> Hans Åberg 14. September 2016 um 15:20
>> Looks like a bug:
>>
>> If there is no text immediately following a formula, the following paragraph
>> is not treated as such, but as the text follow
Looks like a bug:
If there is no text immediately following a formula, the following paragraph is
not treated as such, but as the text following it.
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits, lcgreek=normal, default=normal]
\setupindenting[yes,medium,next]
\starttext
For
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 11:23, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> In the example below, using latest ConTeXt, the bracket "[f]” does not show
>> when using \startformula.
> I think it gets interpreted as an (option
In the example below, using latest ConTeXt, the bracket "[f]” does not show
when using \startformula.
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\setupmathematics[lcgreek=normal, default=normal]
\starttext
\startformula
[f] = B
\stopformula
$$
[f] = B
$$
\stoptext
___
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 07:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
> sure, but when you do
>
> \appendtoks
> \catcode`\‘=\active
> \def‘#1’{\csname #1\endcsname}
> \to …
FYI, this does not work for me; I must use LuaTeX \letcharcode:
\def\usemathcommand#1’{\csname #1\endcsname}
\appendtoks
\catcode`‘=\active
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 07:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 9/12/2016 10:02 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> It does not happen with TeX using
>> \catcode`\‘=\active
>> \def‘#1’{\csname #1\endcsname}
>
> sure, but when you do
>
> \appendtoks
> \catcode`\‘=\acti
> On 12 Sep 2016, at 21:45, Hans Hagen wrote:
> fwiw, the current beta makes math characters also letters now
I saw it. Fine!
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki
> On 12 Sep 2016, at 21:45, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 9/12/2016 8:25 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> But then there seems to be a bug in the LuaTex \letcharcode command: There
>> must be a character between “$” and the first occurring \activecatcode
>> letter. Possibl
Found a workaround: The idea is to use \csname …\endcsname with two delimiters
not likely to be used in math mode, below chosen to ‘…’.
But then there seems to be a bug in the LuaTex \letcharcode command: There must
be a character between “$” and the first occurring \activecatcode letter.
Possi
Just found that the code below does not work as intended, because \𝐝𝐢𝐦 will be
parsed as \𝐝 followed by 𝐢𝐦. Can’t tell if it ought to be changed, though one
could think other cases where it might be natural. The command definition of \𝐝
works though.
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\setupmathematic
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 18:19, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>> Hans Åberg 10. September 2016 um 17:31
>>
>> Does it cover those listed here:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Alphanumeric_Symbols
> \setupbodyfont[xits,30pt]
OK. Fine. Adding a
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 17:13, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>>> The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicod
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicode math semantic styles. So
>> perhaps the TeX commands should expand to these:
>
> what tex commands ... we're talking
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 10:09, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
> Most math fonts come only with a regular style which provides upright,
> italic, bold and bolditalic symbols but all of them part of the same font,
> only a few fonts provide also a bold style (which is usefull in sections)
> which com
> On 17 Jun 2016, at 06:20, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 01:02:48 +0200
> Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> The idea is avoiding clashes between variables and constants, like
>> this:
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>> \setupmathemat
> On 16 Jun 2016, at 23:48, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 6/16/2016 9:15 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> There were no responses from the consortium here, so it means that if one
>> should stick to the Unicode model, where the upright styles are unified with
>> the B
> On 15 May 2016, at 22:06, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> On 15 May 2016, at 20:42, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>> On 5/15/2016 8:31 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>>> also, the lack of an upright alphabet in unicode will always make some 'x'
>>>> in t
> On 8 Jun 2016, at 22:33, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> I uploaded a new beta.
>>
>> The OS X installation page does not say how to update when installing system
>> wide into /Applications/.
>>
>> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Mac_Installation
>
> just run first_setup again
OK.
_
> On 8 Jun 2016, at 16:41, Hans Hagen wrote:
> I uploaded a new beta.
The OS X installation page does not say how to update when installing system
wide into /Applications/.
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Mac_Installation
__
> On 7 Jun 2016, at 00:05, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 6/6/2016 11:10 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> You are welcome. Unicode has added math styles, which some fonts have, like
>> STIX. Those not in the chart below have other positions, as they were added
>> earlier.
&g
> On 6 Jun 2016, at 22:48, Freddy Omar López Quintero
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your tips!!
You are welcome. Unicode has added math styles, which some fonts have, like
STIX. Those not in the chart below have other positions, as they were added
earlier.
http://www.unicode.org/charts/
http://ww
> On 6 Jun 2016, at 20:20, Freddy Omar López Quintero
> wrote:
> I'm trying to make a document that need fill the requirement to have all
> fonts sans serifed; but, with the following minimal code, just work for the
> normal text and doesn't for the math portion.
The STIX fonts have them, ex
> On 31 May 2016, at 17:04, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/31/2016 4:18 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> It is possible to get the symbol : COLON U+003A to expand to \colon, instead
>> of the ratio operator, as it is now?
> it's a commented option
What does that mean?
>
It is possible to get the symbol : COLON U+003A to expand to \colon, instead of
the ratio operator, as it is now? The latter is rather rare in pure math, and
in addition, it seems to have been reversed in the implementation with ∶ RATIO
U+2236, cf. example below.
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\sta
> On 30 May 2016, at 21:59, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/30/2016 6:55 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> In the example below, \startformulas starts a new paragraph with indenting,
>> whereas \startformula does not. Is there any way to avoid that?
> will be fixed in a next beta
In the example below, \startformulas starts a new paragraph with indenting,
whereas \startformula does not. Is there any way to avoid that?
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\setupindenting[yes, medium, next]
\starttext
Some text.
Some more text
\startformulas
\startformula
2 + 2 = 4
\stopfo
> On 29 May 2016, at 20:58, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>> Hans Åberg 29. Mai 2016 um 20:49
>> The pages [1], "Using math mode” suggests
>> \NN
>> is equivalent to
>> \NC $$
>>
>> 1.
>> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/
> On 29 May 2016, at 20:42, L.S.-Soc&Gam wrote:
>
> You also shouldn't paste blackboard characters as you did in your example.
>
> Instead you should use \blackboard command ->
I want to use Unicode characters, making the source code more readable.
__
> On 29 May 2016, at 18:57, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>> Hans Åberg 29. Mai 2016 um 18:38
>> For some reason, the use of \NN as in the first table below is not working.
>> It works fine using math columns, though, as in the second table below.
> What do you
For some reason, the use of \NN as in the first table below is not working. It
works fine using math columns, though, as in the second table below.
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\starttabulate[|c|c|]
\NN x \NN ¬x \NR
\HL
\NN 𝕗 \NN 𝕥 \NR
\NC 𝕥 \NN 𝕗 \NR
\stoptabulate
\starttabulate[|mc|mc|]
> On 22 May 2016, at 15:15, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/21/2016 8:39 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> The code below works. One can alternatively put it on the \starttyping
>> command, admitting mixing with traditional monospace code at other places.
>> The idea here is to
> On 21 May 2016, at 20:03, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>> OK. There are two different issues involved: if one wants to use a monospace
>> font, and if one wants it verbatim, without TeX translation. For me, the
>> latter would suffice. The typing environment, it seems, combines the two,
>> a
> On 21 May 2016, at 18:31, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
> You need a font which has the necessary symbols or you take the missing one
> from another font but in this case you should look for one which has a
> similar style as the main font (which is not the case in my example).
>
> \definefal
The typing environment does not seem to work on non-ASCII characters: below, ∀,
≔ and ∈ drop out. Perhaps not available in monospace, substituting nothing.
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\starttyping
∀(i, k) ∈ I×K: C(i, k) ≔ ∑_(j∈J) A(i, j)·B(j, k)
\stoptyping
__
> On 15 May 2016, at 19:32, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> On 15 May 2016, at 19:14, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>> On 5/15/2016 2:33 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> Maybe a way to distinguish between unary prefix operator “-“, and binary
>>> infix operator “-“: {} is i
> On 15 May 2016, at 20:00, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 7:44 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> Invisibles of different semantic meaning are pretty tricky to use in the
>> input, because it is hard to detect errors.
>
> a proper monospace editor font would show it
In
> On 13 May 2016, at 12:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
> in principle one can make ∫ and \int but that has other side effects
> \appendtoks
>\catcode`∫=\activecatcode
> \to \everymathematics
One should add
\def\∫{∫}
before the code above. This way one can use both. For example:
\setupbodyfont[xi
> On 19 May 2016, at 18:49, Meer, Hans van der wrote:
>
> Checked again also on a MacBook, definitely not searchable here.
> I am running El Capitan, and the command reference version is the one from
> May 17, 2016, found in one of the latest contextbeta distributions.
You probably need to det
> On 19 May 2016, at 18:49, Meer, Hans van der wrote:
>
> Checked again also on a MacBook, definitely not searchable here.
> I am running El Capitan, and the command reference version is the one from
> May 17, 2016, found in one of the latest contextbeta distributions.
You probably need to det
> On 19 May 2016, at 17:00, Meer, Hans van der wrote:
>
> The command reference in file i-context.pdf is highly useful, but that
> document is not searchable, neither with Preview nor Adobe Reader.
Searches work for me in Preview.
> On 16 May 2016, at 11:10, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/16/2016 10:59 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> The TeX syntax is too loose to do input that is close to the input. For
>> example, in math, if properly parsed, the "{…}” can often be replaced by the
>> normal “(…)
> On 16 May 2016, at 10:48, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> interesting tex was flexible enough to survive many decades
>>
>> Other survivors are C, C++, Scheme. With TeX, change may start as with Lua,
>> only some better syntax for text input.
>
> that always depend on the content; for complex docs te
> On 16 May 2016, at 01:00, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 11:55 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 May 2016, at 23:18, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> but eventually typesetting will become a niche and end up in the arts but
>>>&
> On 15 May 2016, at 23:18, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>>> but eventually typesetting will become a niche and end up in the arts but i
>>> will probably not live long enough to see that happen
>>
>> From the point of computer language design, TeX is not very good. One of the
>> pitfalls of macro pro
> On 15 May 2016, at 20:42, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 8:31 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> there will always be some kind of escape
>>
>> Hopefully from TeX as well. :-)
>
> you can use ms word (which has tex like math but with a gui)
That falls
> On 15 May 2016, at 20:06, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 7:28 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> What do you mean with change by hand ... isn't that what context can do for
>>> you? Operate on all those axes ... (\tf is the upright one). There are
>>>
> On 15 May 2016, at 19:59, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 7:42 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> (where of course we default to default=italic)
>>
>> Yes, but perhaps another name than “default”.
>
> well, it is \mathdefault that is used and the
> On 15 May 2016, at 19:14, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 2:33 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 May 2016, at 23:26, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>
>>> Be careful with empty group in math mode:
>>>
>>> \startformula{} -a \stopfor
> On 15 May 2016, at 15:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/14/2016 7:11 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> In order to align with Unicode, \setupmathematics might have Latin shape
>> options, as the Greek ‘lcgreek’ and ‘ucgreek', say ‘lclatin' and ‘uclatin',
>>
> On 15 May 2016, at 19:35, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
>> Hans Åberg 15. Mai 2016 um 19:32
>>
>> What is \zwnj?
> zero width non-joiner
OK. Invisibles of different semantic meaning are pretty tricky to use in the
input, becau
> On 15 May 2016, at 19:08, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 4:28 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 May 2016, at 15:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/14/2016 7:11 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>>> In order to align with Unicode, \setupma
> On 15 May 2016, at 19:14, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 2:33 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 May 2016, at 23:26, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>
>>> Be careful with empty group in math mode:
>>>
>>> \startformula{} -a \stopfor
> On 15 May 2016, at 19:12, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2016 6:36 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 May 2016, at 16:44, Wolfgang Schuster
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics
>>
>> Here is another vari
> On 15 May 2016, at 16:44, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
> \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics
Here is another variation: using the sans-serif math styles, combining with the
suggestion in the “Nolimits” thread. It would save the effort having to change
all variables into italics by hand,
> On 15 May 2016, at 16:44, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
> \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics
This does the trick. Here more carefully composed example, showing how tricky
it is to use currently:
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\startformula
\startalign
I &= ∫_S d(x)\, dx \NR
I &= ∫_
> On 15 May 2016, at 15:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/14/2016 7:11 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>> In order to align with Unicode, \setupmathematics might have Latin shape
>> options, as the Greek ‘lcgreek’ and ‘ucgreek', say ‘lclatin' and ‘uclatin',
>>
> On 14 May 2016, at 23:26, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Be careful with empty group in math mode:
>
> \startformula{} -a \stopformula
> \startformula\relax -a \stopformula
Maybe a way to distinguish between unary prefix operator “-“, and binary infix
operator “-“: {} is interpreted as an empt
> On 14 May 2016, at 23:26, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>> Use
>>> \startformula\relax
>>> ...
>>> \stopformula
>>
>> Just about anything seems to work:
>> I put in an empty group
>> \startformula{}
>> ...
>> \stopformula
>
> Be careful with empty group in math mode:
>
> \startformula{} -a \st
> On 14 May 2016, at 18:41, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 May 2016, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>
>>> On 14 May 2016, at 01:25, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>>> installing and running the garden distribution is quite simple (as is
>>> updating) ..
In order to align with Unicode, \setupmathematics might have Latin shape
options, as the Greek ‘lcgreek’ and ‘ucgreek', say ‘lclatin' and ‘uclatin',
both defaulting to ’italic’. Unicode added the Latin italic symbols to the Math
Alphanumeric Symbols range, so the upright letters are inaccessible
> On 14 May 2016, at 01:25, Hans Hagen wrote:
> installing and running the garden distribution is quite simple (as is
> updating) .. there are less files too (so no big burden to have it alongside
> tex live)
With this installation, I get a strange bug:
In the example below, the first integr
> On 13 May 2016, at 12:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> in principle one can make ∫ and \int but that has other side effects
What side effect do you have in mind here?
___
If your question is of interest to others as we
> On 14 May 2016, at 01:25, Hans Hagen wrote:
> installing and running the garden distribution is quite simple (as is
> updating) .. there are less files too (so no big burden to have it alongside
> tex live)
I installed it on OS X 10.11.5 Beta in /Applications/ConTeXt. Then it turns out
tha
> On 13 May 2016, at 22:53, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Tex Live 2016 is about to be released in few weeks time [1], so hopefully,
>> it has a later version. Final updates May 16.
>>
>> 1. https://www.tug.org/texlive/
>
> you can install the version from the context garden alongside (independent)
>
> On 13 May 2016, at 21:46, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> This example generates an error (ConTeXt 0.61 with TeX Live 2015):
> for older engines
>
> \installanddefineactivecharacter `∫ {\int}
>
> \appendtoks
> \catcode`∫=\activecatcode
> \to \everymathematics
That does not work either. I can hack
> On 13 May 2016, at 17:51, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2016, Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>> There may not be so many symbols: the “large operators" in the Tex Book, p.
>> 435, though Unicode have more, and some others like √ U+221A for \sqrt.
>
>
> On 13 May 2016, at 14:08, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/13/2016 1:55 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 May 2016, at 13:35, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/13/2016 1:07 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 13 May 2016, at
> On 13 May 2016, at 13:35, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 5/13/2016 1:07 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 May 2016, at 12:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>
>>> in principle one can make ∫ and \int but that has other side effects
>>
>> What side ef
> On 13 May 2016, at 12:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> in principle one can make ∫ and \int but that has other side effects
What side effect do you have in mind here?
___
If your question is of interest to others as we
In the example below, the nolimits directive [1] is not working in display
style on a Unicode integral sign ∫ U+222B, though it works with \int, and in
inline style. Example below compiled with ‘context’ of TeX Live 2015. - I have
found no differences between using STIX and XITS fonts.
1. http:
> On 9 May 2016, at 12:15, Arthur Reutenauer
> wrote:
>
>> PS: I guess that ConTeXt still lacks support for fillers and
>>
>> \startalign[snakes]
>> ...
>> \stopalign
>
> The snakes idea is actually pretty close to the practice of Kashida in
> Arabic typography (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
101 - 185 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
