On 24 Jul 2015, at 11:40, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:09 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:50, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
A little bit more of intelligence can be given with
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup
\unexpanded\def
On 24 Jul 2015, at 11:43, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:22 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:43, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
Well, you can make the colon active in math mode and then let it output
\colon.
This is a TeX way, I don't know
On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:34, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
I have experimented with a theorem proof assistant that admitted parallel
ASCII and Unicode symbol names, but it turns out to be complicated. Think of
C/C++ trigraphs, a chore to implement, only to be removed in the latest
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:26, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:08 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
I was thinking of just having the two, \colon and \ratio. Looking into some
books before electronic typesetting, the spacing of the latter can vary
widely: some do not use spaces at all
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:28, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:13 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
You can add it if you think it is no problem. Proper Unicode characters in
the input help the readability, so putting them at high priority seems good.
fyi, on the agenda for the gyre
On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:48, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
In the examples I mentioned (below), running ‘context’ on the first produces
large colons, whereas ‘luatex’ on the second does not. The latter looks
right to me.
define 'luatex' ... it's all about choices that macro packages make
On 24 Jul 2015, at 21:58, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 6:57 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
The Unicode monospace characters were added by mistake, because in
computer science, style does not affect semantics, as it does math.
Looking into old computer science books, they do
On 24 Jul 2015, at 18:34, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 6:18 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:28, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:13 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
You can add it if you think it is no problem. Proper Unicode characters in
the input
On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:29, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 4:19 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
The function $f: A → B$, $g\colon A → B$.
we could add a mathsymbol entry but I leave that to Aditya to decide
{
adobename=colon,
category=po,
cjkwd=na,
description=COLON
On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:29, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/24/2015 2:32 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
[Note: I use the cc to know that I have received a reply.]
On 24 Jul 2015, at 10:30, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:06 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40
[Note: I use the cc to know that I have received a reply.]
On 24 Jul 2015, at 10:30, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 7/20/2015 6:06 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes it
behave as in math functions (as in example below). Has ConTeXt a similar
option?
lualatex
\documentclass[leqno]{article}
\usepackage[colon=literal]{unicode-math}
\begin{document}
The function $f: A → B$.
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes it
behave as in math functions (as in example below). Has ConTeXt a similar
option?
No. You have to use
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:50, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
A little bit more of intelligence can be given with
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup
\unexpanded\def~}{\futurelet\tmptoken\docolon}
On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:43, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
Well, you can make the colon active in math mode and then let it output
\colon.
This is a TeX way, I don't know if there's a ConTeXt way for this:
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup
\let~}\colon
On 20 Jul 2015, at 18:37, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Jul 2015, at 16:40, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
The LaTeX package unicode-math has an option colon=literal, which makes
On 20 Jul 2015, at 18:37, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
It is easy to change the mapping, but if the mapping is reversed, is there is
standard name for : as a relation?
Looking into a book on algebraic geometry, it seems fine to use operator : for
projective coordinates. So skip
On 20 Jul 2015, at 18:37, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Hans Aberg wrote:
It would be nice with such an option, as it helps the readability of the
input files.
There are two uses of colon in math, as a relation (in sets \{ x : f(x) = 0
\} and in ratios
On 20 Jul 2015, at 21:34, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. It's true that the colon used
in \colon differs from the one used if you input : directly by default
(it's smaller).
Right. For some reason, your code gives the right, smaller, colon
On 20 Jul 2015, at 21:34, Manuel Blanco manue...@ucm.es wrote:
The definition of a coordinate separator should be with \mathpunct,
although it doesn't look particularly good, so may be better to use no
space at all (as commented in other mails).
In the case of \ratio, since it's a binary
On 7 Jul 2015, at 16:47, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I get errors when using \MC - see example below.
The \NR before \stopmathcases is missing in all your examples.
OK. Though I know it, it is hard to get used to, coming from LaTeX.
But the spacing is wrong:
On 7 Jul 2015, at 04:46, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
The spacing is different in cases - TeX also has such a variation.
Specifically, there is extra space before the conditionals.
In addition, it seems \startmathcases ... \stopmathcases is not working with
ConTeXt does not seem to have LaTeX style environments. FYI, for the latter, I
developed [1] a long time ago more advanced ones:
The environments admit hooks, i.e., code executed before and after the local
group. The name can be omitted in the closing, which works also when using one
On 7 Jul 2015, at 20:17, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You can set the alignment for each column in a matrix with the align key.
\definemathmatrix
[aligned]
[n=2,
align={right,left},
distance=\spaceamount]
\starttext
\startformula
J^j:
On 7 Jul 2015, at 21:49, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You should google for mathalign.pdf which explains and shows examples for the
matrix, cases etc. environments.
To get the same result as your LaTeX example you can use the m key for
\startalign.
On 7 Jul 2015, at 20:17, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You can set the alignment for each column in a matrix with the align key.
FYI, the document amshelp.pdf says that AMS-LaTeX environments align, align*,
and aligned, can have multiple alignments, and gives this
On 7 Jul 2015, at 21:18, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have also put in an extra alignment to see what happens, monospace code
alignment style. Changing ‘left’ to ‘right did not seem to have any effect
here.
Can you see the effect of the alignment?
On 7 Jul 2015, at 21:49, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
You should google for mathalign.pdf which explains and shows examples for the
matrix, cases etc. environments.
It looks rather basic, except for last formula of section 9.
The document amshelp.pdf, ch. 7, has
On 7 Jul 2015, at 11:05, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
For LaTeX style environments do you mean
e.g.
https://it.sharelatex.com/learn/Environments
? (just to be sure )
Yes, the \begin{foo} … \end{foo} syntax. Technically, an environment means that
variables are stacked in a
Smallmatrix from AMS-TeX is not implemented in ConTeXt (Tex Live 2015), though
crossed out in m-newmat.tex. I found this old post:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2005/013146.html
___
If your question is
The example below shows the intended output when using original TeX code
(compiled with ‘context' of TeX Live 2015): a pair of left braced formulas.
The first comment shows what works in AMS-LaTeX.
However, when trying similar ConTeXt commands, I get the error shown in the
comment below. What
I get too much spacing after the integrals when using ‘context’ (TeX Live 2015)
- see first example below. Cf. the second example below, compiled with luatex.
In ConTeXt, the result is the same regardless of body font, and also if using
original TeX \int.
--- context ---
[I do not get copies from the list, though having signed up.]
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On 6 Jul 2015, at 11:24, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:
The example below shows the intended output when using original TeX code
(compiled with ‘context' of TeX Live 2015): a pair of left braced
[I do not get copies from the list, though having signed up.]
Smallmatrix from AMS-TeX is not implemented in ConTeXt (Tex Live 2015),
though crossed out in m-newmat.tex.
You can create your own matrix environment for inline use:
\definemathmatrix
[smallmatrix]
[left=\Big(,
I want to define an environment for computer code including non-ASCII
characters, using Xits or STIXGeneral except in the ASCII range, where some
monospace font like Courier should be used.
If I do:
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\definetyping[code]
\setuptyping[code][margin=yes]
\starttext
35 matches
Mail list logo
