On 7/14/2017 7:18 PM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:33:22 +0200 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Anyway, the previous mail with the patch checks for al three
'missing' fields so this is basically the same issue. If not, let
me know.
As far as I can the patch works fine. I even was able to
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:33:22 +0200 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> Anyway, the previous mail with the patch checks for al three
> 'missing' fields so this is basically the same issue. If not, let
> me know.
As far as I can the patch works fine. I even was able to include it
in the latex fontloaders (with
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:33:22 +0200 schrieb Hans Hagen:
>> (But I don't know if it is really a bug in the font as xelatex with
>> harfbuzz has no problems.)
> I don't know what harfbuzz does but the font definitely does some ssty
> mapping to rather simple glyphs with no extensible parts so
On 7/12/2017 11:01 AM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:00:15 +0200 schrieb Ulrike Fischer:
The problem is that with the stix 2 math fonts, parentheses don't
grow in a font with active +ssty feature when using luatex with the
context based fontloader. (With xelatex everything is
Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:00:15 +0200 schrieb Ulrike Fischer:
> The problem is that with the stix 2 math fonts, parentheses don't
> grow in a font with active +ssty feature when using luatex with the
> context based fontloader. (With xelatex everything is fine, harfbuzz
> seems to do it as wanted).
The following is a context adaption of this tex.SX question:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/380262/left-right-problem-with-stix-math-two-when-small-applied-to-the-group-luala
The problem is that with the stix 2 math fonts, parentheses don't
grow in a font with active +ssty feature when
