On 11-3-2011 7:12, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Thank you. What exactly was the reason to disable the old syntax? Why
not maybe defining it to give at least a warning (or even error)
printing out a message saying what to do. It is a bit weird to see the
code compile fine without ever noticing that some
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 18:31, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 11-3-2011 3:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> Dear Hans,
>>
>> subject says it all: when I use \synctex=1 in mkiv, I don't get any
>> ..synctex.gz file. The --synctex switch works however (which is exactly
>> the opposite of what used to be the ca
On 11-3-2011 3:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Dear Hans,
subject says it all: when I use \synctex=1 in mkiv, I don't get any
..synctex.gz file. The --synctex switch works however (which is exactly
the opposite of what used to be the case a while ago :).
\synctex is a nop in mkiv, use a proper direc
2011/3/11 Mojca Miklavec :
> Dear Hans,
>
> subject says it all: when I use \synctex=1 in mkiv, I don't get any
> .synctex.gz file. The --synctex switch works however (which is exactly
> the opposite of what used to be the case a while ago :).
>
Hi Mojca,
\enabledirectives[system.synctex] is inst
Dear Hans,
subject says it all: when I use \synctex=1 in mkiv, I don't get any
.synctex.gz file. The --synctex switch works however (which is exactly
the opposite of what used to be the case a while ago :).
In MKII both works.
Mojca
___
