Re: [NTG-context] A default editor for ConTeXt standalone?

2014-02-16 Thread Joshua Krämer
On 2014-02-05, 7:41, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Hi all, just a thought. Some time ago wise people decided to include TeXworks into TeXlive, so that newbies installing TeXlive can get a batteries-included package (not having to choose/install an editor). Would it be (a) reasonable and (b) not

Re: [NTG-context] A default editor for ConTeXt standalone?

2014-02-05 Thread Keith J. Schultz
Hi, As nice as it would be to have ConTeXt Standalone offer an editor, I personally believe that it should not be done. 1) Those that have TeXlive already TeXWorks At least it is setup for TeXLive and can be set up to use ConTeXt Standalone and other distros at the same time. 2)

Re: [NTG-context] A default editor for ConTeXt standalone?

2014-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/5/2014 7:41 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Hi all, just a thought. Some time ago wise people decided to include TeXworks into TeXlive, so that newbies installing TeXlive can get a batteries-included package (not having to choose/install an editor). Would it be (a) reasonable and (b) not too

[NTG-context] A default editor for ConTeXt standalone?

2014-02-04 Thread Marcin Borkowski
Hi all, just a thought. Some time ago wise people decided to include TeXworks into TeXlive, so that newbies installing TeXlive can get a batteries-included package (not having to choose/install an editor). Would it be (a) reasonable and (b) not too much time-consuming to do a similar move with