Re[2]: [NTG-context] AMS-style bibliography?

2005-11-20 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Sunday, November 20, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Bug will be fixed in the next release, and I've added your > file, thanks. Cool. Can we please have it released before my deadline? ;) -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-c

Re: [NTG-context] AMS-style bibliography?

2005-11-20 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Please find attached my first go at an AMS-like style. Can you tell me why the pub list shows without brackets? This is the code I have in my doc. That was a bug: If you'd used only one \setuppublications, it would've worked (the numbercommand is reset at each invocatio

Re[2]: [NTG-context] AMS-style bibliography?

2005-11-19 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Saturday, November 19, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> Is there a pre-rolled bibliography style that looks follows >> the AMS specs? > Probably not, but point me to the AMS specs. I also > have a "numbered" style planned, c.f. "plain.bst", > and a style for the ntg's Maps.

Re[2]: [NTG-context] AMS-style bibliography?

2005-11-19 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Saturday, November 19, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> Is there a pre-rolled bibliography style that looks follows >> the AMS specs? > Probably not, but point me to the AMS specs. I also > have a "numbered" style planned, c.f. "plain.bst", > and a style for the ntg's Maps.

Re: [NTG-context] AMS-style bibliography?

2005-11-19 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Is there a pre-rolled bibliography style that looks follows the AMS specs? Probably not, but point me to the AMS specs. I also have a "numbered" style planned, c.f. "plain.bst", and a style for the ntg's Maps. There are now 4 bibl-XXX files in the zip, all with bad name

[NTG-context] AMS-style bibliography?

2005-11-18 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Is there a pre-rolled bibliography style that looks follows the AMS specs? (BTW, when trying out various alternatives= I found that only aps works, all of the others bomb complaining extra # marks. I'm using a September 2005 version of t-bib ... do I need to upgrade?) __