On Tue, 9 May 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Thanks. For my present project I need short month names, and the
deadline is tomorrow. So, I will stick to the manual solution at the
moment.
There should be no need for manual fixes, just do this:
\unprotect
On Mon, 8 May 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
However, the bib module does not support this naming scheme. I get
\month{1}
\month{2}
etc in my bbl file. Can this be corrected?
Sure, it is just an oversight. For this to work, only a redefinition
of
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Thanks. For my present project I need short month names, and the
deadline is tomorrow. So, I will stick to the manual solution at the
moment.
There should be no need for manual fixes, just do this:
\unprotect
\def\insertmonth#1#2#3%
Hi Taco,
In my bib file, I have month enteries like
month=jan,
month=feb,
and so on. While I was learning latex, I read somewhere that this is
better than writing explicit names for the month as the bst file can
then choose whether to use long names or short names. It is also
possible to
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
However, the bib module does not support this naming scheme. I get
\month{1}
\month{2}
etc in my bbl file. Can this be corrected?
Sure, it is just an oversight. For this to work, only a redefinition
of \insertmonth is needed (I had intented that all
