On 1/2/2018 11:30 PM, Henri wrote:
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 22:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote:
\starttext
oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
\bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\stoptext
\mb : there is no full-blown bold math in latin modern,
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 22:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote:
> >
> > \starttext
> >
> > oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
> >
> > \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
> >
> > \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
> >
> > \stoptext
> \mb : there is no full-blown bold math in latin modern,
On 01/02/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote:
> \starttext
> oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
> \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
> \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
> \stoptext
Hi Henri,
I can confirm the issue with bold math.
From the beta backups I have, it seems to have been introduced in beta
from 2017.10.24 10:30
On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote:
\starttext
oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
\bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\stoptext
\mb : there is no full-blown bold math in latin modern, just use \bf
Hans
-
\starttext
oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$
\bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$}
\stoptext
test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
Hi.
I use ConTeXt in Debian. If this helps, please keep it in mind:
dpkg -l context gives:
ii context 2012.05.30.20120611-1
Now, if you consider the following:
code
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
On 12-8-2012 22:25, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hi.
I use ConTeXt in Debian. If this helps, please keep it in mind:
dpkg -l context gives:
ii context 2012.05.30.20120611-1
Now, if you consider the following:
code
you can try ad here:
Dear Hans,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:41:09AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
you can try ad here:
\definebodyfontenvironment[14pt]
Thanks.
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][modern][modern][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath]
Hello Hans,
I wanted to use
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default]
\starttext
$\boldsymbol θ$
\stoptext
but it seems to fail in mkii and has no influence in mkiv. (The
workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no
difference.)
1. Is there
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:12, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello Hans,
I wanted to use
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default]
\starttext
$\boldsymbol θ$
\stoptext
but it seems to fail in mkii
Sorry, I take my word back. It works OK with \boldsymbol{θ}. However
the
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
and has no influence in mkiv. (The
workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no
difference.)
in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional
vectors); bold alphabets are part of math in unicode and should work ok
but
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
and has no influence in mkiv. (The
workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no
difference.)
in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional
vectors); bold alphabets are part
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:23, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
and has no influence in mkiv. (The
workaround in mkii is to use \theta instead of θ, in mkiv it makes no
difference.)
in mkiv (unicode) we need complete bold fonts .. (or make additional
vectors);
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I have tried to enter MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC SMALL THETA directly
with LM, but it didn't work (probably there are some mappings still
missing, but it's a bit uncomfortable to type proper mathematical
symbols anyway as editor is somehow lacking the characters and
keyboard
Hi,
what is the current (preferred) way of using math bold symbols.
Bostjan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Bostjan Vesnicer wrote:
Hi,
what is the current (preferred) way of using math bold symbols.
For MKII, define
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [latin-modern] [default]
and then use \boldsymbol around symbol that you want in bold.
For MKIV, bold math isn't
Thanks, Aditya.
I have the same question for calligraphic and doublestroke symbols.
Bostjan
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Bostjan Vesnicer wrote:
Hi,
what is the current (preferred) way of using math bold symbols.
For
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Boštjan Vesnicer wrote:
Thanks, Aditya.
I have the same question for calligraphic and doublestroke symbols.
I do not know of fonts that provide calligraphic and doublestroke symbols.
Calligraphic uppercase letters, and doublestroke letters are provided by
ams fonts,
Hi,
I needed to use \boldsymbol recently, and studied the different
solutions that have been posted on the mailing list. Using a \hbox
wrapper seems to be the easiest way, but none of the definitions using
\hbox took care of spacing around the symbols. Since ConTeXt now has
equivalents of
how about \closesymbol (sluitsymbol in dtch)
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 |
Hans Hagen wrote:
how about \closesymbol (sluitsymbol in dtch)
sorry, different thread -)
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The
I am using the follwing (extracted) typescript lines for math in the lucida fonts:\starttypescript [luc] \definetypeface [luc][mm][math][lucidayy][default][encoding=texnansi] \definetypeface [luc][mm][bfmath][lucidayy][default][encoding=texnansi]\stoptypescript\starttypescript [math]
Is it possible to activate bold math printing in a
chapter/section/subsection title? In the example the
numbers withing math mode (and the greek symbols)
are set in regular style, while the rest of the title
is printed in bold.
This is an example using the euler math fonts:
At 8/30/2004 10:50, you wrote:
Is there a simple way to get bold (, |, *, and ) in math?
nikolai
I don't know how to get them in the standard cmr fonts, but I have the
lucida fonts installed and realised these bold characters as follows:
\definetypeface [mainface] [rm] [serif]
Sytse Knypstra wrote:
At 8/30/2004 10:50, you wrote:
Is there a simple way to get bold (, |, *, and ) in math?
nikolai
I don't know how to get them in the standard cmr fonts, but I have the
lucida fonts installed and realised these bold characters as follows:
\definetypeface [mainface]
Is there a simple way to get bold (, |, *, and ) in math?
nikolai
--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull:: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA:: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden:::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
Hi all.
I've revisited the euler support scripts with an eye towards bold math. I
think I have it right now.
I tried applying the same techniques to computer-modern math in order to
get bold math going for the TeX default font, and it seems not to switch
back to the right font after a grouped
At 10:48 21/11/2003, you wrote:
Ahoj,
On November 11 I asked the list how I could generate bold greek math
symbols (I have the lucida family installed).
Until now I didn't get a response, so maybe I should be more specific.
Let me put it this way:
On page 12 of the `Fonts in ConTeXt' manual I
Ahoj,
On November 11 I asked the list how I could generate bold greek math
symbols (I have the lucida family installed).
Until now I didn't get a response, so maybe I should be more specific.
Let me put it this way:
On page 12 of the `Fonts in ConTeXt' manual I find the footnote:
`Bold math is
Hi all,
I would like to use bold greek math symbols (I have the lucida family
installed).
In the `Fonts in ConTeXt' manual I concluded from page 12 that this should
be relatively simple.
However all my attempts failed: either I got the normal math symbols or I
got all (roman and greek) symbols
30 matches
Mail list logo
