Aditya Mahajan:
By default, in all three formats the font for \log is mathupright rather
than textrm. There needs to be a rationale for ConTeXt default to be
different from other formats. Do you have any reference to a math book or
journal that uses text fonts for \log-like operators?
Thanks
On 5/16/2015 4:23 PM, Maggyero wrote:
Aditya Mahajan:
By default, in all three formats the font for \log is mathupright rather
than textrm. There needs to be a rationale for ConTeXt default to be
different from other formats. Do you have any reference to a math
book or
journal that
On 5/16/2015 2:24 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Maggyero wrote:
Aditya Mahajan:
The default should be \mathupright (as is the case in amstex
and latex, and probably also plaintex).
Hans Hagen:
next beta: when one of the stylealternatives text mode else mathmode
(default
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Maggyero wrote:
Aditya Mahajan:
The default should be \mathupright (as is the case in amstex
and latex, and probably also plaintex).
Hans Hagen:
next beta: when one of the stylealternatives text mode else mathmode
(default nothing == math upright)
Hans Hagen:
Because
Aditya Mahajan:
The default should be \mathupright (as is the case in amstex
and latex, and probably also plaintex).
Hans Hagen:
next beta: when one of the stylealternatives text mode else mathmode
(default nothing == math upright)
Hans Hagen:
Because like in \mtext, the \text command is
On 5/13/2015 5:51 PM, Maggyero wrote:
Because like in \mtext, the \text command is ESSENTIAL (for the function
names to have the mathcodes, kerning and ligatures of the text mode
instead of the ones of the math mode).
that is not needed because if you use a style known as text style a text
Hans Hagen:
mfunction will stay as it is also needed for tagged pdf and exporting
(basically it's an apply math function thing) so if something else is
needed another name/mechanism have to be made (with appropriate tagging)
the label itself is a special case as it's optional (and is just
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Maggyero wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
for functions one can now use:
\setupmathematics
[functionstyle=\rm]
Fantastic! Thank you Hans, it is way better than the old mechanism
\setmathfunctionstyle. Now I have a few suggestions to improve the
consistency of this new
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
Note that there is no consensus on how the `d` in calculus should be
typeset. There are also \differentiald and \differentialD that map to
unicode slots.
Maybe not consensus, but see tug.org/TUGboat/tb18-1/tb54becc.pdf
And in my opinion, names for operators and subscripts should all be
upright, that is adaptative to the surrounding TEXT STYLE (\rm, \ss and
\tt) BUT not adaptative to the surrounding TEXT ALTERNATIVE or MATH
ALTERNATIVE (\it, \bi, \sl, \bs) and stay in the normal alternative \tf
(upright).
This
On 5/12/2015 4:19 PM, Maggyero wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
for functions one can now use:
\setupmathematics
[functionstyle=\rm]
Fantastic! Thank you Hans, it is way better than the old mechanism
\setmathfunctionstyle. Now I have a few suggestions to improve the
consistency of this new
Hans Hagen wrote:
for functions one can now use:
\setupmathematics
[functionstyle=\rm]
Fantastic! Thank you Hans, it is way better than the old mechanism
\setmathfunctionstyle. Now I have a few suggestions to improve the
consistency of this new mechanism. First, I think this functionstyle key
Sorry, I did 3 typos in my previous post.
— First typo:
3. Using only \mathlabeltext with \setuplabeltext is also more consistent
with the current \labeltext that works with \setuplabeltext.
3. Using only \mathlabeltext with \setupmathlabeltext is also more
consistent with the current \labeltext
Hi Aditya,
Thanks for your remark: indeed with the correct use of \underline, I get what
was intended, but somehow before yesterday ConTeXt was more tolerant and for
years it accepted my wrong definition of \liminf…
However, with the new features of \setupmathematics, the underlined word lim
Thanks Hans!
Out of curiosity I tried textcolor and textstyle as in
\setupmathematics [functionstyle=, functioncolor=darkred,
textstyle=bold, textcolor=blue]
and discovered that these two work also…
By the end of the week I’ll wikify these.
Thanks and best regards: OK
On 11 May 2015,
On 5/11/2015 9:07 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Aditya,
Thanks for your remark: indeed with the correct use of \underline, I get what
was intended, but somehow before yesterday ConTeXt was more tolerant and for
years it accepted my wrong definition of \liminf…
However, with the new features of
On 5/11/2015 7:08 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\definealternativestyle [\v!sansnormal] [\ss\tf]
%definealternativestyle [\v!sansbold][\ss\bf]
\definealternativestyle [\v!serifnormal] [\rm\tf]
\definealternativestyle [\v!serifbold] [\rm\bf]
These appear to work. Note that sansbold is
On 5/11/2015 6:16 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
next beta: when one of the stylealternatives text mode else mathmode
(default nothing == mathupright)
\starttext
\setupmathematics[functionstyle=,functioncolor=darkred]
{\ss $\sin x$} {\bf $\sin x$}
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/11/2015 6:16 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
next beta: when one of the stylealternatives text mode else mathmode
(default nothing == mathupright)
\starttext
\setupmathematics[functionstyle=,functioncolor=darkred]
On Sun, 10 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
next beta: when one of the stylealternatives text mode else mathmode
(default nothing == mathupright)
\starttext
\setupmathematics[functionstyle=,functioncolor=darkred]
{\ss $\sin x$} {\bf $\sin x$}
On Sun, 10 May 2015, Otared Kavian wrote:
Everything works fine, except that when one tries to modify, for instance the
definition of \liminf (in order to have it as an underlined lim), ConTeXt
reports an error.
%\definemathcommand [liminf] [limop] {\underline\mfunctionlabeltext{lim}}
On Sun, 10 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/9/2015 4:16 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
i've added (uploading beta now)
\setupmathematics
[functionstyle=\ss,
functioncolor=red]
\starttext
\startformula
f =
On 5/10/2015 2:19 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/9/2015 4:16 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
i've added (uploading beta now)
\setupmathematics
[functionstyle=\ss,
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the new feature in \setupmathematics.
I did some testing of the feature on a several documents, , and followed the
discussions you had with Aditya and Wolfgang.
Everything works fine, except that when one tries to modify, for instance the
definition of \liminf (in order to
On 5/9/2015 4:16 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
i've added (uploading beta now)
\setupmathematics
[functionstyle=\ss,
functioncolor=red]
\starttext
\startformula
f = \sin i\omega x^{\sin(x^{\sin(y)})}
On 5/9/2015 2:03 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
There is a question on TeX.SX asking how to change the font of \sin,
\cos, etc.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/243893/323
I looked at the code, and there does not appear to be an easy solution.
The \mathfunctionlabeltext command has \mathupright
Am 09.05.2015 um 13:46 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
On 5/9/2015 2:03 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
There is a question on TeX.SX asking how to change the font of \sin,
\cos, etc.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/243893/323
I looked at the code, and there does not appear to be an
On 5/9/2015 2:03 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
There is a question on TeX.SX asking how to change the font of \sin,
\cos, etc.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/243893/323
I looked at the code, and there does not appear to be an easy solution.
The \mathfunctionlabeltext command has \mathupright
Am 09.05.2015 um 02:03 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
Hi,
There is a question on TeX.SX asking how to change the font of \sin, \cos,
etc.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/243893/323
I looked at the code, and there does not appear to be an easy solution. The
Am 09.05.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
On 5/9/2015 1:56 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 09.05.2015 um 13:46 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
mailto:pra...@wxs.nl
mailto:pra...@wxs.nl mailto:pra...@wxs.nl:
On 5/9/2015 2:03 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
There is a
On 5/9/2015 1:56 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 09.05.2015 um 13:46 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
mailto:pra...@wxs.nl:
On 5/9/2015 2:03 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
There is a question on TeX.SX asking how to change the font of \sin,
\cos, etc.
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
i've added (uploading beta now)
\setupmathematics
[functionstyle=\ss,
functioncolor=red]
\starttext
\startformula
f = \sin i\omega x^{\sin(x^{\sin(y)})}
\stopformula
\stoptext
best test this because Mojca will at some point push into tex live (at
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
i've added (uploading beta now)
\setupmathematics
[functionstyle=\ss,
functioncolor=red]
\starttext
\startformula
f = \sin i\omega x^{\sin(x^{\sin(y)})}
\stopformula
\stoptext
best test this because
Hi,
There is a question on TeX.SX asking how to change the font of \sin, \cos,
etc.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/243893/323
I looked at the code, and there does not appear to be an easy solution.
The \mathfunctionlabeltext command has \mathupright hard coded.
One option is to keep this
34 matches
Mail list logo
