On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 09:20, Peter Münster wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
>
>> > a) (dangerous; I would not do it) install a more recent version of
>> > libc on your machine
>>
>> It's NOT possible.
>
> Hello Vnpenguin,
>
> Why not?
>
In our production environment, only RHEL & Ce
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
> > xetex
> xetex: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found
> (required by xetex)
Hello,
Here, I don't know how to help. I've these packages on my system:
libstdc++33-3.3.3
libstdc++33-devel-3.3.3
libstdc++41-devel-4.1.3_20080612
libstdc
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Vnpenguin wrote:
> > a) (dangerous; I would not do it) install a more recent version of
> > libc on your machine
>
> It's NOT possible.
Hello Vnpenguin,
Why not?
> > b) we need to set up some virtual machine with an old linux and
> > compile binaries there or find someone
On Sun, Nov 01 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> >
> >> pdftex
> > pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
> >
> > Any help for this problem ?
>
> This is weird. Peter - did you upgrade your linux in the meantime by
> any chance? (The update dates back to 17th Octo
On 1 November 2009 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
>
> If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
> have a suggesting what OS to take, so that it will remain compatible
> with as many x86_64 processors as possible? (Apparently gl
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:45, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
The current kernel is:
> uname -r
2.6.18-164.2.1.el5
> If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
> have a suggesting what OS to take, so that it will remain compatible
Vnpenguin, what kernel is running on your OS?
If we set up a virtual machine for compiling binaries - does anyone
have a suggesting what OS to take, so that it will remain compatible
with as many x86_64 processors as possible? (Apparently glibc and
kerner are the deciding factors; but it needs to
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:33, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2009/11/1 Vnpenguin :
>> Correction: CentOS 5.4 was released on 21-Oct-2009. So it's not so
>> "old" at all :-)
>
> Sorry, but it is. It's a free version of RHEL5, which was initially
> released in 2007.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centos
>
2009/11/1 Vnpenguin :
> Correction: CentOS 5.4 was released on 21-Oct-2009. So it's not so
> "old" at all :-)
Sorry, but it is. It's a free version of RHEL5, which was initially
released in 2007.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centos
It you want something modern, use e.g. Fedora.
Best
Martin
__
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:10, Vnpenguin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:59, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> Apparently it means that CentOS uses something like a
>> several-years-span-back-in-time libc library and you cannot do much
>> about it. That's no problem in general since you would not take a
>
> Hey, CentOS 5.4 just released on 21-May-2009 :-) If I have problem
> with ConTeXt on CentOS 5.4 so all users of RHEL 5.4 are the same: they
> can not!
>
Correction: CentOS 5.4 was released on 21-Oct-2009. So it's not so
"old" at all :-)
_
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:59, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:24, Vnpenguin wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by
pdftex
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:24, Vnpenguin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>>>
>>> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
>>>
>>> glibc.i686
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:30, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2009/11/1 Vnpenguin :
>> My box CentOS 5.4 with all updates. What do you mean "upgrade" ?
>
> What glibc-version do you have? rpm -qi glibc?
# yum list installed glibc\*
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
Installed Packages
g
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec :
> Or maybe I was too fast. I don't find the exact timeline of libc
> development, so I have no idea how old your linux is. I thought that
> this failure was recent, but apparently it's not (the garden most
> probably has libc-2.8). For 32-bit linux we try to be *very* bac
2009/11/1 Vnpenguin :
> My box CentOS 5.4 with all updates. What do you mean "upgrade" ?
What glibc-version do you have? rpm -qi glibc?
Best
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen :
> Martin Schröder wrote:
>> No, they are simply build on old systems. Ask Peter. :-)
>
> ah, so they're static binaries
Mostly. glibc is not statically linked.
> ldd Master/bin/x86_64-linux/pdftex
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x2b1771708000)
libc.so.6
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:50, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>>
>> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
>>
>> glibc.i686 2.5-42
>>
>> Any help for this problem ?
>
> Yes, t
Martin Schröder wrote:
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen :
Martin Schröder wrote:
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
ah, so maybe you can learn mojca a few tricks then; does this mean that tex
live binaries have some built in magic that checks for libs?
No, they are
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:48, Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> I forgot to ask: does only pdftex cause problems or also metapost,
> luatex, xetex? It might help to know which of these programs still
> work.
>
> mpost
mpost: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by mpost)
> luatex
Thi
2009/11/1 Hans Hagen :
> Martin Schröder wrote:
>> Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
>> 2.4).
>
> ah, so maybe you can learn mojca a few tricks then; does this mean that tex
> live binaries have some built in magic that checks for libs?
No, they are simply build o
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec :
> I'm sweating ... trying to download Sarge DVD on this extra-slow
> connection. And then you remind me that I have a big cartoon box of
> original SuSE 7.2 right below my desk. (Maybe I should start
> considering throwing away a few things like this one, though it seems
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:03, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec:
>> Yes, the easy answer would be "upgrade your linux", but we probably
>> want the binaries to run on slightly older machines as well.
>
> Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
> 2.4).
I'
Martin Schröder wrote:
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec :
Yes, the easy answer would be "upgrade your linux", but we probably
want the binaries to run on slightly older machines as well.
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
ah, so maybe you can learn mojca a few
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
>> when I try pdftex, there is error:
>>
>>> pdftex
>> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (require
2009/11/1 Mojca Miklavec :
> Yes, the easy answer would be "upgrade your linux", but we probably
> want the binaries to run on slightly older machines as well.
Indeed. Btw: The binaries from TL run on SUSE 10.1 (which has glibc
2.4).
Best
Martin
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
>
> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
>
> glibc.i686 2.5-42
>
> Any help for this problem ?
Yes, the easy answer would be "upgrade your linux", but we probably
wa
I forgot to ask: does only pdftex cause problems or also metapost,
luatex, xetex? It might help to know which of these programs still
work.
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an ent
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:00, Vnpenguin wrote:
> Hi,
> Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
> when I try pdftex, there is error:
>
>> pdftex
> pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
>
> Any help for this problem ?
This is weird.
Hi,
Just installed minimal on CentOS x86_64. The installation is ok, but
when I try pdftex, there is error:
> pdftex
pdftex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by pdftex)
> yum list installed glibc*
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Excluding Packages in global excl
30 matches
Mail list logo
