On Uto, 2016-01-26 at 09:57 +0100, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> unfortunately, there's no ConTeXt support, but adding it is a
> questions of a few hours of simple Emacs Lisp hacking).
Let me just say that I've decided to move to Spacemacs (it's RSI-
friendly) along with Org-mode/Gnus etc.
However,
On Pon, 2016-01-25 at 13:55 -0700, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> Beamer presentations look like ... beamer presentations.
That's very true, indeed!
> For something simple using ConTeXt, you might want to look at the
> simpleslides module. That could be a starting point.
That should be installed by
Am 26.01.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Saša Janiška:
> Still, wonder how do you like Pandoc's ability to convert to
> ConTeXt?
I don't use it. ;-)
I use Pablo's solution to convert to ConTeXt.
https://github.com/ousia/from-pandoc-to-context
It adds an additional layer of xml to the process but it
On Pon, 2016-01-25 at 22:15 +0100, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> I used ConTeXt once for a presentation, and then came back to Beamer.
> Not necessarily because it's better, but I know it quite well, so
> I could prepare my slides faster.
Hmm, that's valid point.
> So I don't have a lot of
On Pon, 2016-01-25 at 22:56 +0100, Otared Kavian wrote:
> I have been using Context for all my presentations for many years and
> I think it is easier to use than any Latex package, since out of the
> box I can add pictures, menus, graphs of functions, etc.
That is very encouraging to hear. ;)
On Uto, 2016-01-26 at 09:56 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> The "Considering that there might be need to do such thing more often
> in the future as well as possibility that I might have to produce lot
> of presentations for my public lectures/workshops based on philosophy"
> is an argument for using
On 1/25/2016 9:55 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:11:06 +0100
Saša Janiška wrote:
Hello,
I have just checked that my first post to this list was more than
10yrs ago (end of 2002). Then I was working on some full-sized books
and ended up with LyX/LaTex.
On Uto, 2016-01-26 at 08:34 +0100, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:
> For the sake of completeness, have a look at Pandoc, which produces
> presentations from simple markdown sources in various formats
> including beamer and some nice looking html based presentations.
I usually find too simple and prefer
On 2016-01-26, at 08:34, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:
> Am 25.01.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Saša Janiška:
>> How does ConTeXt compare for the purpose vs LaTeX/Beamer?
>
> For the sake of completeness, have a look at Pandoc, which produces
> presentations from simple markdown
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Saša Janiška wrote:
I'm (well) aware of ConTeXt's advantage in the sense of being complete
package without clashing of different packages which usually happens in
LaTeX world, I wonder if someone can give some piece of advice to learn
and/or switch ConTeXt for preparing
Dear Saša Janiška,
I’d like tell you about my case.
I have used Beamer long time ago, but now I am using ConTeXt + Simpleslides
module for my presentations.
There are already many given templates.
You can find them in the doc of simple slides.(…../tex/texmf-modules/doc/…)
However we can make
Am 25.01.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Saša Janiška:
> How does ConTeXt compare for the purpose vs LaTeX/Beamer?
For the sake of completeness, have a look at Pandoc, which produces
presentations from simple markdown sources in various formats including
beamer and some nice looking html based
Hello,
I have just checked that my first post to this list was more than 10yrs
ago (end of 2002). Then I was working on some full-sized books and ended
up with LyX/LaTex. Later, had few attempts to switch to ConTeXt, but as
a result I reduced even my LyX/LaTeX usage and was using light markups
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:11:06 +0100
Saša Janiška wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just checked that my first post to this list was more than
> 10yrs ago (end of 2002). Then I was working on some full-sized books
> and ended up with LyX/LaTex. Later, had few attempts to switch to
>
Hi,
I have been using Context for all my presentations for many years and I think
it is easier to use than any Latex package, since out of the box I can add
pictures, menus, graphs of functions, etc.
Now, depending on the complexity of what one wants to do, it would be more or
less easy to
On 2016-01-25, at 21:55, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> Beamer presentations look like ... beamer presentations.
Or like presentations given from The One Editor:
http://mbork.pl/download/Slides_about_LaTeX_editing.pdf
;-)
> For something simple using ConTeXt, you might want to
16 matches
Mail list logo