Re[2]: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >>Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote: >> >> >> >>>this is a variant of taco's posted solution: >>> >>> >> >>[snip] >> >> >> >>>so, this way you can hook in a command that is executed after the symbol >>>plac

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Hans Hagen
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote: this is a variant of taco's posted solution: [snip] so, this way you can hook in a command that is executed after the symbol placement I like it! (Ok, I won't use it this time because in the mean time I

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote: > this is a variant of taco's posted solution: [snip] > so, this way you can hook in a command that is executed after the symbol > placement I like it! (Ok, I won't use it this time because in the mean time I reworked the text to use \head, with the

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Hans Hagen
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Thursday, November 24, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote: Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: However, I find it really 'funny' that there are n different methods to create items in an enumeration ... should these be rather enumeration options, so that you can use the same source

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Hans Hagen
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: This is why I was thinking of using \head, still, for example. but \head does not take an argument; it just treats the first paragraph as special Hans ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/ma

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> However, I find it really 'funny' that there are n different >> methods to create items in an enumeration ... should these >> be rather enumeration options, so that you can use the same >> source code and just chang the

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >>>(PS. I cannot send mail to your address, it bounces, do you have an >>>alternative one?) >>> >>> >> >>Hm, which address is bouncing? bigfoot is long dead, use >>the one I'm sending this from. >> >> >> > I get: > Whe

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: However, I find it really 'funny' that there are n different methods to create items in an enumeration ... should these be rather enumeration options, so that you can use the same source code and just chang the stuff in \setup/\staritemize to achieve the different effects?

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Hans Hagen wrote: >> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> >>> Yes, that's a good start :) however, I would leave the >>> option to have both the symbol and the text, exactly as if >>> it was run-in \head (i.e. with the actual item test >>> following the \

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hans Hagen wrote: Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Yes, that's a good start :) however, I would leave the option to have both the symbol and the text, exactly as if it was run-in \head (i.e. with the actual item test following the \head text on the same line). However, you ma want to have this as an opt

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Hans Hagen
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: (PS. I cannot send mail to your address, it bounces, do you have an alternative one?) Hm, which address is bouncing? bigfoot is long dead, use the one I'm sending this from. I get: When trying to deliver your message, the mail server at controller-1 encounter

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Hans Hagen
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Yes, that's a good start :) however, I would leave the option to have both the symbol and the text, exactly as if it was run-in \head (i.e. with the actual item test following the \head text on the same line). However, you ma want to have this as an option to \head ... ma

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > Something like this? Yes, that's a good start :) however, I would leave the option to have both the symbol and the text, exactly as if it was run-in \head (i.e. with the actual item test following the \head text on the same line). However, yo

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-24 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, Something like this? (PS. I cannot send mail to your address, it bounces, do you have an alternative one?) Hans \unprotect \def\v!txt{txt} \appendtoks \letvalue\v!txt \itemgrouptext \to \itemgroupcommands \setfalse\txtlistitem \def\itemgrouptext#1% {\def\symsymbol{\doitemattribute

Re[3]: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-23 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Wednesday, November 23, 2005 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > Wednesday, November 23, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote: >> you want more space for the sym? >> \startitemize[5*broad] >> \item {word} >> \item {another} >> \stopitemize >> (if needed, you can define an itemgroup with a default wider left m

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-23 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Wednesday, November 23, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >>Hello, >> >>does ConTeXt have something which is halfway between >>itemizations and descriptions? I have a small set of >>properties that should be enumerated together. Right now I'm >>doing it by defining a \description a

Re: [NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-23 Thread Hans Hagen
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Hello, does ConTeXt have something which is halfway between itemizations and descriptions? I have a small set of properties that should be enumerated together. Right now I'm doing it by defining a \description and then doing \desc{something} stuff \par \desc{something e

[NTG-context] Halfway between itemizations and descriptions

2005-11-23 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Hello, does ConTeXt have something which is halfway between itemizations and descriptions? I have a small set of properties that should be enumerated together. Right now I'm doing it by defining a \description and then doing \desc{something} stuff \par \desc{something else} other stuff \par etc