On 10/20/2015 5:11 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
My understanding of PDF/UA is a very valid requirement to make texts
accessible through standard tools, in particular but not limited to
users having visual deficiencies, for example. This is the reason, not
hype, behind the US government pushing this
On 10/20/2015 4:35 AM, Andrew Dunning wrote:
On 19 Oct 2015, at 5:33 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Indeed context supports tagged pdf already for a while, although only acrobat
can do something with it. Making it default is not really an option as there is
overhead involved (a bit
Am Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:10:29 +0200 schrieb luigi scarso:
>> Please note that the PDFs produced by ConTeXt when tagging is enabled are
>> still some steps short of being PDF/UA compliant. You can check this with
>> the freely available "PDF Accessibility Checker". (Just google for it.)
>
On 10/20/2015 10:10 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Christoph Reller
> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:35:46 -0400 > wrote:
>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:35:46 -0400 wrote:
> > On 19 Oct 2015, at 5:33 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >
> > Indeed context supports tagged pdf already for a while, although only
> acrobat can do something with it. Making it default is not really an option
> as
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Christoph Reller <
christoph.rel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:35:46 -0400 wrote:
>
>> > On 19 Oct 2015, at 5:33 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> >
>> > Indeed context supports tagged pdf already for a while,
On 10/20/2015 3:37 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:31:05 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
but no public spec ... just a to be payed for iso one ..
Is the following useful?
http://www.aiim.org/Research-and-Publications/standards/committees/PDFUA/
no fun reading from a
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 9:26 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>
> Will look into it (sorry, but I am kind of ignorant to new standards,
> that I don't use myself) :D
That’s hugely appreciated; I am not much of a programmer, but let me know if
there is anything I can do to help.
All best,
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 5:32 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>
> You are the first user of this feature, so your job will be to test it
> properly, once it's implemented. The programming work will exclusively
> be done by Hans. All I do is find out the formal definitions of the
> standard
Am 20.10.2015 um 20:03 schrieb Andrew Dunning:
>
>> On 20 Oct 2015, at 9:26 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>>
>> Will look into it (sorry, but I am kind of ignorant to new standards,
>> that I don't use myself) :D
>
> That’s hugely appreciated; I am not much of a programmer, but let me
Am 20.10.2015 um 09:12 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 10/20/2015 4:35 AM, Andrew Dunning wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Oct 2015, at 5:33 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>
>>> Indeed context supports tagged pdf already for a while, although only
>>> acrobat can do something with it. Making it default is
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:31:05 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> but no public spec ... just a to be payed for iso one ..
Is the following useful?
http://www.aiim.org/Research-and-Publications/standards/committees/PDFUA/
Alan
Dear list,
I am beginning to see increasing need for PDF/UA (ISO 14289) files. Earlier
this year, the US Access Board announced an update to the rules for the
accessibility of electronic documents produced by the government that embraces
the standard, which I expect will make it much more
On 10/19/2015 5:50 PM, Andrew Dunning wrote:
Dear list,
I am beginning to see increasing need for PDF/UA (ISO 14289) files. Earlier
this year, the US Access Board announced an update to the rules for the
accessibility of electronic documents produced by the government that embraces
the
My understanding of PDF/UA is a very valid requirement to make texts
accessible through standard tools, in particular but not limited to
users having visual deficiencies, for example. This is the reason, not
hype, behind the US government pushing this standard.
Alternative rendering (via web
> On 19 Oct 2015, at 5:33 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> Indeed context supports tagged pdf already for a while, although only acrobat
> can do something with it. Making it default is not really an option as there
> is overhead involved (a bit more runtime and much larger filesize)
16 matches
Mail list logo