Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:39 29/09/2003 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > i admit that typescripts are not fast, but the advantages of the current
> > > method is that i can change them easily as well as use different criteria
> > > when loadi
At 12:39 29/09/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i admit that typescripts are not fast, but the advantages of the current
> method is that i can change them easily as well as use different criteria
> when loading them; i did some experiments with (memory hungry) preloa
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i admit that typescripts are not fast, but the advantages of the current
> method is that i can change them easily as well as use different criteria
> when loading them; i did some experiments with (memory hungry) preloading,
> but on my system it made no re
At 14:18 28/09/2003 +0200, you wrote:
It is related to the \usetypescript command: it reloads all the
typescript files that have been declared with \usetypescriptfile.
Don't know why. There is probably a good reason, since Hans is
normally in mso-mode (maximum speed optimize).
i admit that typescr
Steffen Wolfrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> So it's 12 seconds compared to 5 seconds (or just 1 with LaTeX).
> Is this normal?
I have to say that this is normal. I haven't found any magic switch
yet to make ConTeXt faster.
>
> Do I have a good chance that my typescript (see below) could b
